Give back octave3.0 on sparc

Please, give back octave3.0/3.0.1-6 on sparc. The autobuild failed with a cryptic message [1]: g++ -c -fPIC -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast -O2 -g ./DLD-FUNCTIONS/fft2.cc -o pic/fft2.o /tmp/cc3m4XSW.s: Assembler messages: /

Re: please unblock reportbug-ng

Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 04:51:08PM +, Bastian Venthur wrote: >> Hi, >> >> reportbug-ng now supports /usr/share/bug/*/script and sends the output >> if the file is available. The lack of this feature rendered rng unfit >> for release in the eyes of the release team, sinc

Re: New release of uw-imap prepared and uploaded to experimental

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:24:46PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: >In case you weren't aware, you need to *tell* the release team you've >gone forward if you want your transition managed in any way. Thanks for clarifying. I got no feedback (before now)

Re: please unblock reportbug-ng

Le mardi 22 juillet 2008 à 18:51 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit : > reportbug-ng now supports /usr/share/bug/*/script and sends the output > if the file is available. The lack of this feature rendered rng unfit > for release in the eyes of the release team, since it's implemented now Does it suppo

Re: please unblock libidn/1.9-1

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:23:31AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >Please unblock libidn/1.9-1 > >It uses an upstream released tarball with a fix for the RC bug 484093 > >It has been in unstable for 10 days signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: please unblock reportbug-ng

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:19:23AM +, Bastian Venthur wrote: > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 04:51:08PM +, Bastian Venthur wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> reportbug-ng now supports /usr/share/bug/*/script and sends the output > >> if the file is available. The lack of this fe

Re: Mozilla in Lenny

Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008 à 07:57 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > (I may have forgotten some others, if you can think of some, please > followup. I'll also do that myself if I remember something important) For epiphany, blockers are the following: * #393837 which was flagged critical by the

please unblock rdate/1:1.1.3-2

Otavio please approve rdate/1:1.1.3-2 Release team please unblock it. Changes: rdate (1:1.1.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . [ Jérémy Bobbio ] * When "-vv" is specified, rdate now displays a dot each time it tries to send a packet to the NTP server. This is needed to implement can

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup > plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26 > before final ack on that release. If this is the d

Re: please unblock rdate/1:1.1.3-2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Otavio please approve rdate/1:1.1.3-2 > > Release team please unblock it. > > Changes: > rdate (1:1.1.3-2) unstable; urgency=low > . >[ Jérémy Bobbio ] >* When "-vv" is specified, rdate

Re: please unblock rdate/1:1.1.3-2

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:28:47PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > Release team please unblock it. Done. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:

Re: please unblock reportbug-ng

Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:19:23AM +, Bastian Venthur wrote: >> Pierre Habouzit wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 04:51:08PM +, Bastian Venthur wrote: Hi, reportbug-ng now supports /usr/share/bug/*/script and sends the output if the file is avai

Re: [SRM] etch-n-half late git-core update permission (Was: [PATCH 0/5] add pack index v2 reading capability to git v1.4.4.4)

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:12:17PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Okay, I asked permission to some SRMs that weren't shocked by this > late update, and I'd be really glad if the updated git-core could sneak > in. Please go ahead with the upload. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp K

Re: [SRM] etch-n-half late git-core update permission (Was: [PATCH 0/5] add pack index v2 reading capability to git v1.4.4.4)

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:24:27PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:12:17PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Okay, I asked permission to some SRMs that weren't shocked by this > > late update, and I'd be really glad if the updated git-core could sneak > > in. > > Please g

Re: [etch-and-half] release notes review

[ dropping every ones but Moritz' and Andrea's personal e-mail address from cc; adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to cc ] Hi Moritz! Moritz Muehlenhoff schrieb: > Andreas Schuldei and I will work on a press release and pass it to the > press team (unless they've started somethi

please unblock xulrunner

Hi, can someone please unblock xulrunner? 1.9.0.1-1 fixes CVE-2008-2785[0] which is a fairly important security issue that allows arbitrary code execution by overflowing a CSS reference counter. Every iceweasel user who has not switched off java script could be affected by this. More about the

Re: [etch-and-half] release notes review

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 02:35:46PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > [ dropping every ones but Moritz' and Andrea's personal e-mail address > from cc; adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] > to cc ] > > Hi Moritz! > > Moritz Muehlenhoff schrieb: > > > Andreas Schuldei and I

Re: please unblock reportbug-ng

Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 22 juillet 2008 à 18:51 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit : >> reportbug-ng now supports /usr/share/bug/*/script and sends the output >> if the file is available. The lack of this feature rendered rng unfit >> for release in the eyes of the release team, since it's i

Re: please unblock reportbug-ng

On 2008-07-23, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, mainly because it is not obvious to me what the fields in this file > mean. Please read the README.developers shipped with reportbug. It documents this and other issues, like usage of yesno and getkey commands in bug scripts. /Sune

Re: please unblock reportbug-ng

Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008 à 16:05 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit : > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Does it support /usr/share/bug/*/control files now ? > > No, mainly because it is not obvious to me what the fields in this file > mean. Because of that, totem and epiphany-browser reports that were

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny

Hi Aurelien, On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:19:01PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > - The switch to linux-libc-dev 2.6.25 is the reason why glibc currently > FTBFS on hppa (due to a timeout in a test). Unfortunately I don't know > yet which change causes the problem, I am down to a 600 lines diff. Ha

Re: Bug#491601: madwifi-source fails to build against 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-486

Hi, On 21.07.2008, at 08:40, dann frazier wrote: Also note that the ath5k driver is included in the 2.6.24 kernel - I don't personally know how much hardware works with madwifi but not ath5k though. Well, for one thing, it's missing some exotic features like, say, Master mode. ;) Regards,

Re: Bug#491601: madwifi-source fails to build against 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-486

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:42:20PM +0200, Michael Goetze wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.07.2008, at 08:40, dann frazier wrote: >> >> Also note that the ath5k driver is included in the 2.6.24 kernel - I >> don't personally know how much hardware works with madwifi but not >> ath5k though. > > Well, for one

Re: Give back octave3.0 on sparc

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:08:02 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > Please, give back octave3.0/3.0.1-6 on sparc. The autobuild failed with a > cryptic message [1]: > > g++ -c -fPIC -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast -O2 -g

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:02:26 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I'd prefer to have it on experimental before upload it to unstable so > first and more urgent issues wouldn't bother us and users however this > is more up to you and RM team then me. My preference would be: > > - upload to experim

user-mode-linux 2.6.25 [was Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload]

[d-boot probably not interested in this subtopic] On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:48:20PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup > plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26 > before final ack on that re

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:02:26 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> I'd prefer to have it on experimental before upload it to unstable so >> first and more urgent issues wouldn't bother us and users however this >> is more up to you and RM team then me.

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

[NB: This mail looks different from previous preparation mails. Its ] [concrete layout is still to be determined, though. ] Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r4 = An up-to-date version is at . We

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Philipp Kern wrote: > We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian > distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can You mean etch, don't you? -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:24:33AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Philipp Kern wrote: > > We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian > > distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can > You mean etch, don't you? Sure. Classical copy'n'paste mistake.

Re: Mozilla in Lenny

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:26:58 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008 à 07:57 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : >> (I may have forgotten some others, if you can think of some, please >> followup. I'll also do that myself if I remember something important) > > For epiphany, blockers

Re: Mozilla in Lenny

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:39:58PM +, Sam Morris wrote: > There's also a bug unreported in Debian so far, but that affects epiphany > very badly. When a file is downloaded, instead of displaying the > 'download complete' notification, epiphany crashes. This doesn't happen > every time, but I

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:07:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > That's just adding an arbitrary 5 days delay. Uploading to experimental > > won't uncover new issues, because nobody uses packages in experimental. > Uploading it to sid, will make a revertion to .25 much harder if > needed. Be

Re: New release of uw-imap prepared and uploaded to experimental

* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:35:57 +0200]: Hello, Jonas, > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:24:46PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > >In case you weren't aware, you need to *tell* the release team you've > >gone forward if you want your transition managed in any way. > Thanks for clarifying.

Re: binNMU for gdal and then mapserver

* Francesco P. Lovergine [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:21:08 +0200]: > Ok, I found finally that GDAL 1.5.2 has problems with optimization and > GCC 4.3, so I'm going to upload an -3 with optimization off to close > #489124 which should be considered indeed a RC issue. Sorry, I got a bit lost on the thread

Re: Bug#484121: fixed in tasksel 2.75

* Josselin Mouette [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:52:45 +0200]: > Le mardi 22 juillet 2008 à 04:32 +, Joey Hess a écrit : > >Please note that this upload should not be allowed to reach testing > > before > >meta-gnome2 2.22.2~2 does. However, I've been waiting on that for exactly > >one mon

Re: noweb stuck in sid

* Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:14:17 -0400]: > On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:27:57 +0100 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > * Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]: > > > How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the > > > dependency on iconx is unversi

Re: please unblock xulrunner

* Nico Golde [Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:03:34 +0200]: > Hi, > can someone please unblock xulrunner? > 1.9.0.1-1 fixes CVE-2008-2785[0] which is a fairly important > security issue that allows arbitrary code execution by > overflowing a CSS reference counter. Neil had an "age-days" set to 2, but that'

unblocking e2fsprogs

To -boot: ok to unblock e2fsprogs? * Theodore Tso [Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:43:53 -0400]: > In any case, e2fsprogs has been in testing for six days now (seven by > tomorrow morning :-), and I think it is ready for testing. I > understand that the freeze for libraries had already happened (I > didn't

Re: Why you need not upload with urgency=high for the freeze

* Sandro Tosi [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:47:00 +0200]: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:13, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | Packages that are present in unstable the day we freeze will be > > | automatically allowed into testing, that is, the freeze date (next > > | weekend) does not mean

Re: please unblock libidn/1.9-1

* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:21:07 +1000]: Hello, Aníbal. > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:23:31AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >Please unblock libidn/1.9-1 > >It uses an upstream released tarball with a fix for the RC bug 484093 > >It has been in unstable for 10 days As

Re: openbabel-2.2 transition

(JFTR: it was agreed with me on IRC to go forward with this.) -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Andrés Calamaro - Nos volveremos a ver -- To UN

Re: New release of uw-imap prepared and uploaded to experimental

On other news... > >binNMUs scheduled now. > Thanks! If you could take care of filing bugs against asterisk and prayer so that they build-depend on libc-client-dev instead of libc-client2007-dev, and upload quick/prompt NMUs if needed, I'd be very grateful. If you really can't, please let me kno

Re: unblocking e2fsprogs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I trust you on this. Will unblock when I hear back from the d-i > people (because of the udeb). No objection. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R -

Re: unblocking e2fsprogs

* Otavio Salvador [Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:46:31 -0300]: > Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ok, I trust you on this. Will unblock when I hear back from the d-i > > people (because of the udeb). > No objection. Unblocked. -- Adeodato Simó dato at ne