Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Cced debian-x@) On 07/06/08 at 21:13 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:26:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: > > > * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful > > for transitional purpose in Etch

More give-backs

2008-06-08 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Please give back the following packages, they should build now: adabrowse # (mips mipsel) ale # (alpha mips mipsel powerpc) autogen # (alpha mips mipsel powerpc) bouml # (alpha mips mipsel powerpc) devhelp # (alpha mips mipsel) facturalux # (alpha m

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:44:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > The timing could have been slightly better... I had time to prepare > iceweasel 3.0~rc2-1 and upload it on gluck (you can find it on > http://people.debian.org/~glandium/, signed and ready to upload, but it > requires xulrunner 1.9 in u

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:42:53AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:44:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > The timing could have been slightly better... I had time to prepare > > iceweasel 3.0~rc2-1 and upload it on gluck (you can find it on > > http://people.debian.org/~glandi

Re: More give-backs

2008-06-08 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:28:13AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Please give back the following packages, they should build now: Done, except for xfce-notes-plugin, which was not found. Please specify the give-backs as "gb . " (arches space-separated) in the future. (: Kind regards, Philipp Ke

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Andreas Barth
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 08:55]: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:15:50PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080607 09:08]: > > > - I upload both iceweasel and xulrunner rc2 releases to unstable, after > > > I'm ready to upload them, and after you tell

Re: More give-backs

2008-06-08 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:41:05AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:28:13AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > Please give back the following packages, they should build now: > > Done, except for xfce-notes-plugin, which was not found. Please specify

Re: More give-backs

2008-06-08 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:28:13AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Please give back the following packages, they should build now: > > Done, except for xfce-notes-plugin, which was not found. Please specify > the give-backs as "gb . " (arches space-separated) > in the futur

Re: nsis binNMU

2008-06-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Paul Wise [Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:21:50 +0800]: > I'm not able to reproduce #484938 (makensis not being built on amd64) > after a rebuild on pergolesi, nor my laptop. However, the buildd log > for amd64 clearly shows that the binary is not being produced and the > tests not run. I'm hoping that a b

Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 09:24:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I found those issues as well (there are 84 packages failing to build > because of that). I discussed this briefly on #debian-x, but it's not > clear yet if the X maintainers want to revert this change. > > I would personally prefer i

why is apt blocked from testing?

2008-06-08 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Hello, please look at http://bugs.debian.org/473559, which makes aptitude completely unusable in the ru_RU.UTF-8 locale and makes Russian installations (at least from mini.iso) fail. In the log, there is a comment: "These bugs should be fixed by apt 0.7.12, which I've just uploaded to the arch

Re: why is apt blocked from testing?

2008-06-08 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:36:38PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > However, according to http://packages.qa.debian.org/apt, apt is currently > blocked from testing by pkern. Shouldn't this block be reconsidered given > the impact of the bug? The block is temporary until d-i beta2 is out.

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > If my network stays in this state for the next few days and I can't > > upload, maybe I can send an interdiff between the last .diff.gz in > > experimental and the new .diff.gz so that someone could upload for me. > > Volunteers? >

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Andreas Barth
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 15:46]: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > If my network stays in this state for the next few days and I can't > > > upload, maybe I can send an interdiff between the last .diff.gz in > > > experimental and the new .diff.

Re: Bug#482476: marked as done (Security: Unsafe lock file creation can be used to truncate arbitrary files)

2008-06-08 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:58:53PM -0700, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:27:55PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > Changes: > > apt (0.7.14) unstable; urgency=low > > [snip] > > >[ Otavio Salv

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:07:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 15:46]: > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > If my network stays in this state for the next few days and I can't > > > > upload, maybe I can send an inter

Please unfreeze openssh 1:4.7p1-12

2008-06-08 Thread Colin Watson
openssh (1:4.7p1-9 to 1:4.7p1-12) Maintainer: Debian OpenSSH Maintainers Too young, only 9 of 10 days old Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) Not considered Could you please unfreeze this? The updates are mostly a long series o

Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-08 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Sunday 08 June 2008 02:55:23 am Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 09:24:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I found those issues as well (there are 84 packages failing to build > > because of that). I discussed this briefly on #debian-x, but it's not > > clear yet if the X maintain

Re: Please unfreeze openssh 1:4.7p1-12

2008-06-08 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:30:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > openssh (1:4.7p1-9 to 1:4.7p1-12) > Maintainer: Debian OpenSSH Maintainers > Too young, only 9 of 10 days old > Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact debian-release if > update is needed) > Not consider

comerciais e documentos e muito mais

2008-06-08 Thread P.G.
cobrancas modelos de pedidos, carta comercial de todos os tipos Propostas, modelos de convites para eventos exemplo de documentos, Visite: http://www.modelosdecartascomerciais.com Oferecemos um pacote de modelos de cartas comerciais modelos de cartas de recomendação, textos prontos Emprego,

Planning a GNUstep transition.

2008-06-08 Thread Hubert Chathi
Hello, release team, Due to licensing issues, we have been unable to legally update the core GNUstep libraries (gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gnustep-back) to the latest upstream versions while keeping all our applications. This issue has recently been resolved, and so the GNUstep team would like to

Re: Please unfreeze openssh 1:4.7p1-12

2008-06-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 08 June 2008, Colin Watson wrote: > openssh (1:4.7p1-9 to 1:4.7p1-12) > Maintainer: Debian OpenSSH Maintainers > Too young, only 9 of 10 days old > Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact > debian-release if update is needed) Not considered > > Could you please u

Re: Please unfreeze openssh 1:4.7p1-12

2008-06-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 08 June 2008, Colin Watson wrote: > > Could you please unfreeze this? The updates are mostly a long series of > > fairly minor adjustments following the recent OpenSSL security update > > mitigation work. > > > > CCing debian-bo

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Andreas Barth
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 15:46]: > Anyways, the .dsc, .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz are out there, ready to be > built and uploaded. Please feel free to do so when you feel is the right > time (I guess waiting for openoffice wouldn't be a bad idea, for > instance). Actually, we don't

hppa release status

2008-06-08 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, during the upload of python2.5, the build failed on hppa due to stalls in the test suite, see http://bugs.debian.org/483042 and http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=python2.5&ver=2.5.2-5&arch=hppa&stamp=1211583145&file=log (Matthias "fixed" that bug by disabling the testsuite, not somethin

Re: New openal-soft packages in mentors.d.n

2008-06-08 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What is the status about openal? > > Basically, the old library (OpenAL SI from creative) is deprecated in favor > of > OpenAL Soft. Right now I'm currently waiting for someone to upload > openal-soft to the archive. > >> I think if we want to have tha

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] Planning a GNUstep transition.

2008-06-08 Thread Gerold Rupprecht
On 2008-06-08 20:24:27 +0200 Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ___ > Debian GNUstep maintainers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnustep-maintainers > Dear Hubert, I would very much like t

Re: New openal-soft packages in mentors.d.n

2008-06-08 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Reinhard Tartler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 21:51]: >> Executive summary: the new package is basically an soname bump, all >> reverse depends need to be rebuilt. This has been tested, only one >> package is problematic: boson. We expect that this issu

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Andreas Barth
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 16:18]: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:07:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 15:46]: > > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > > If my network stays in this state for the next few

Please binNMU seahorse on amd64

2008-06-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, while uploading stuff for the xulrunner transition, I have built seahorse in an unclean environment, and it lead to the build using gecko 1.8 instead of 1.9. Rebuilding it should be enough to get rid of the issue, so could you please schedule a binNMU? Thanks, -- .''`. : :' : We are d

Re: Please binNMU seahorse on amd64

2008-06-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Josselin Mouette [Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:40:12 +0200]: > Hi, > while uploading stuff for the xulrunner transition, I have built > seahorse in an unclean environment, and it lead to the build using gecko > 1.8 instead of 1.9. > Rebuilding it should be enough to get rid of the issue, so could you >

Re: New openal-soft packages in mentors.d.n

2008-06-08 Thread Andres Mejia
On Sunday 08 June 2008 4:22:56 pm Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Reinhard Tartler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 21:51]: > >> Executive summary: the new package is basically an soname bump, all > >> reverse depends need to be rebuilt. This has been tested, on

Re: hppa release status

2008-06-08 Thread Thibaut VARENE
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, this demands enough buildd power, and wanna-build access by > (some of) the porters (or whatever else you consider appropriate). > Moreover it needs quite a lot of time to track that closely, which the > Release

Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition

2008-06-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:36:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Ok. Unfortunatly xulrunner seems to FTBFS on all arches due to missing > javaxpcom.jar (some difference between -B and -b I assume), see > http://bugs.debian.org/485284 Sorry :-/ > If we need another upload anyways, can we do an lib