Give-backs? for flamerobin

2008-05-31 Thread Damyan Ivanov
[Please CC me in replies] Dear release managers, Until recently flamerobin was listed in P-A-S as only supporting i386 and amd64, because its build-dependency - firebird2-dev - supported only these. These days, flamerobin build-depends on firebird2.0(-dev), which is built on amd64, arm, i386,

Re: Give-backs? for flamerobin

2008-05-31 Thread Philipp Kern
Damyan, am Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:57:06PM +0300 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > Shall give-backs "just work" or should I do a sourceful upload? the removal from p-a-s already triggered the builds... Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Develope

Re: Bug 418176 to be fixed in r4?

2008-05-31 Thread Shachar Or
I'm sorry that I do not know the procedure... I guess that the packager needs to upload now, or your approval in this matter is required or are we waiting for the packager to say something? On Friday 30 May 2008 14:15, Shachar Or wrote: > Here's the patch. I'm sorry, I don't know what this chang

bin-NMUs for the packages depending on libc-ares1

2008-05-31 Thread Andreas Schuldei
please initiate bin-NMUs for the packages depending on libc-ares1 when the new c-ares package (libc-ares2) has made it into the archive: apt-cache rdepends libc-ares1 libc-ares1 Reverse Depends: rtorrent libcurl3-gnutls libcurl3 libc-ares-dev gnash-common claws-mail-vcalendar-plugin

why isn't cppunit moving to testing?

2008-05-31 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, So bjorn.haxx.se says: Checking cppunit * trying to update cppunit from 1.12.0-3 to 1.12.1-1 (candidate is 98 days old) * Updating cppunit makes 2 non-depending packages uninstallable on i386: libsp-gxmlcpp-dev, libsp-gxmlcpp1c2a o binary package libsp-gxmlcpp-dev is part

Re: why isn't cppunit moving to testing?

2008-05-31 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 02:44:12PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi, > > So bjorn.haxx.se says: > > Checking cppunit > > * trying to update cppunit from 1.12.0-3 to 1.12.1-1 (candidate is 98 > days old) > * Updating cppunit makes 2 non-depending packages uninstallable on i386: > lib

Re: bin-NMUs for the packages depending on libc-ares1

2008-05-31 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:51:07PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > please initiate bin-NMUs for the packages depending on libc-ares1 > when the new c-ares package (libc-ares2) has made it into the > archive: > > apt-cache rdepends libc-ares1 > libc-ares1 > Reverse Depends: > rtorrent > libcu

Re: why isn't cppunit moving to testing?

2008-05-31 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 02:57:27PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > OK, so I discovered the answer to #2: it is indeed uninstallable in > sid; see below. I think gxmlcpp just needs to be rebuilt to cope with > the cppunit SONAME change (cppunit lib package is now > libcppunit-1.12-1). Does this n

Re: ffmpeg-php's binNMUs give-backs

2008-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:13:26PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > The ffmpeg-php binNMU's have failed in alpha, mipsel, and powerpc. > It looks like the binNMU's need to be given back. Done. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

ffmpeg-php's binNMUs give-backs

2008-05-31 Thread Raphael Geissert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The ffmpeg-php binNMU's have failed in alpha, mipsel, and powerpc. It looks like the binNMU's need to be given back. Cheers, - -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug 418176 to be fixed in r4?

2008-05-31 Thread Michael Biebl
Shachar Or wrote: I'm sorry that I do not know the procedure... I guess that the packager needs to upload now, or your approval in this matter is required or are we waiting for the packager to say something? Well, if the RMs ack this two line change, I, as co-maintainer of hal, would be willi

online BSP next weekend?

2008-05-31 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi all, According to [1] there are more than 400 RC bugs for lenny, which are, as usually, +400 too many. Isn't it time to organise another online BSP soon? for example next weekend? If the release team decides to organise another online BSP please also consider mentioning the links to the bug

Re: verilog REMOVED from testing

2008-05-31 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 04:39:43PM -0600, Debian testing watch wrote: > FYI: The status of the verilog source package > in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > > Previous version: 0.8.5-1.2 > Current version: (not in testing) > Hint: (no removal hint found) (Due to a hint from madc

Re: verilog REMOVED from testing

2008-05-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 04:39:43PM -0600, Debian testing watch wrote: >> FYI: The status of the verilog source package >> in Debian's testing distribution has changed. >> >> Previous version: 0.8.5-1.2 >> Current versi