ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 01:03 +0100 schrieb Thiemo Seufer: > Several packages are stuck in "Building" status for 47 days on peri, for > no apparent reason: > > gcj-4.1 > haskell-hsql-odbc > haskell-hsql-postgresql > haskell-hsql-mysql > > Maybe giving them back helps. Thanks Thiemo. H

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

2008-05-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 11:28, Jan Wagner wrote: > While reading about the issues of renumbering L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET on > http://blog.icann.org/?p=309, we should provide asap an up to date db.root > file. Reading that blog post, it becomes clear to me that there's no immediate problem with this add

updates bind9 package for etch?

2008-05-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.3.4-2etch1 Severity: important While reading about the issues of renumbering L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET on http://blog.icann.org/?p=309, we should provide asap an up to date db.root file. The actual file can be obtained from: http://www.internic.net/zones/named.root Thanks

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

2008-05-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Thijs, On Tuesday 20 May 2008 11:58, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Reading that blog post, it becomes clear to me that there's no immediate > problem with this address, only that it ideally "shouldn't have been done > this way". I don't see a ground for doing this "asap". with "asap" wasn't meant D

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

2008-05-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 13:36, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 11:58, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > Reading that blog post, it becomes clear to me that there's no immediate > > problem with this address, only that it ideally "shouldn't have been done > > this way". I don't see a ground for d

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

2008-05-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Thijs, On Tuesday 20 May 2008 13:40, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I think your blog post with title "stolen" suggests malice and is not > representative of the real severity of the issue. I suggest that you add a malice or not, if the old L would have answered with false (in which way ever) answe

Please unblock eject

2008-05-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Please unblock eject 2.1.5-8, which is blocked for its udeb. Changes: * Don't issue an error message about missing dmcrypt script. This avoids some spurios warnings in d-i. Closes: #470760 * Debhelper: - Increase compat level to 6 - Use dh_lintian to install override. Needs

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

2008-05-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 14:11, Jan Wagner wrote: > malice or not, if the old L would have answered with false (in which way > ever) answers, there would be a significant part of users affected. Users > (of users) of a stock bind9 right out of stable are also affected. True, but it doesn't, so there

More give-backs

2008-05-20 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Please give back the following packages, they should build now: libhildonhelp # (mipsel) hildon-desktop # [mipsel needs dep-wait on libhildonhelp0] bin-prot# (arm mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on libtype-conv-camlp4-dev] sexplib310 # (arm hppa ia64 mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on l

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

2008-05-20 Thread Jan Wagner
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 14:14, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 14:11, Jan Wagner wrote: > > malice or not, if the old L would have answered with false (in which way > > ever) answers, there would be a significant part of users affected. Users > > (of users) of a stock bind9 right out

Re: More give-backs

2008-05-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 13:48:02 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > bin-prot# (arm mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on > libtype-conv-camlp4-dev] > sexplib310 # (arm hppa ia64 mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on > libtype-conv-camlp4-dev] > type-conv # (mipsel) > ocaml-res # (mipsel) >

Re: Please unblock eject

2008-05-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Please unblock eject 2.1.5-8, which is blocked for > its udeb. Changes: > >* Don't issue an error message about missing dmcrypt script. > This avoids some spurios warnings in d-i. Closes: #470760 >* Debhelper: >

Re: Please unblock eject

2008-05-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: >> Please unblock eject 2.1.5-8, which is blocked for >> its udeb. Changes: >> >>* Don't issue an error message about missing dmcrypt s

Re: Debian Installer Kernel Migration

2008-05-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 19 May 2008 23:12:31 +0200]: > linux-2.6_tpu approved for migration (will hopefully migrate with the > next britney run) Meh, there were some old 2.6.18 and 2.6.22 packages in t-p-u that made britney think 2.6.24-7 was out of date. Cruft removed by ftpmaster now, it'll hope

Re: Please unblock eject

2008-05-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:58:49AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > >> Please unblock eject 2.1.5-8, which is blocked for > >> its udeb. Changes: > >> > >>* Don't issue an error me

Re: ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Luk Claes
Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, Hi > These can be restarted, dependencies are available: > haskell-http # (powerpc) given back > haskell-hgl # (s390) installed in the mean time... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Here is a small overview of the ghc6 related packages. I'm a bit confused - is this meant to be a complete list? It doesn't mention, e.g., haskell-cgi on powerpc, which AFAICS has all its deps satisfied and just needs to be bui

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 18:55 +0100 schrieb Ian Lynagh: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > > Here is a small overview of the ghc6 related packages. > > I'm a bit confused - is this meant to be a complete list? I was hoping so – it’s from http://re

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Ian Lynagh wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > > Here is a small overview of the ghc6 related packages. > > I'm a bit confused - is this meant to be a complete list? > It doesn't mention, e.g., haskell-cgi on powerpc, which AFAICS has all > its deps sa

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview

2008-05-20 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:02:58PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > haskell-cgi is not in lenny ATM (although it’s in etch). Oh yes, silly me! Thanks Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ghc6 transition overview (update)

2008-05-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, another update from the ghc6 transition. As far as I can tell, there are two things left to do: Upload packages: The following packages have been built by the buildds and should be uploaded, all on powerpc: haskell-anydbm ftphs haskelldb haxml haskell-hgl haskell-hsh haskell-hsql pandoc (Ma

Re: [Debian-haskell] ghc6 transition overview (update)

2008-05-20 Thread John Goerzen
Joachim Breitner wrote: > > libghc6-hdbc-sqlite3-dev > libhugs-hdbc-sqlite3 > hpodder (which is the only reverse dependency) Makes sense to me. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Freeze exception for shadow

2008-05-20 Thread Nicolas François
Dear RMs, I would like to make an update for shadow to fix a bug in the SHA password encryption method. I don't think this patch would be required for security reasons (I consider the current SHA method, with the bug, still more secure as the MD5 password encryption method), but I would prefer to

Re: Base system installation errors in testing due to libldap

2008-05-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Frans Pop [Sun, 18 May 2008 17:38:52 +0200]: > > Given that, maybe even removal would be an option, but I'll leave that to > > RMs. > The removal will happen eventually, since it's been removed from > unstable already. But not be