Re: Bug#477331: cairo bug workarounded at d-i

2008-05-11 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 14:02 -0300 schrieb Otavio Salvador: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello RM team, > > We've added a workaround at d-i to the cairo's bug #477441 to avoid to > delay the installer release. This issue is really serious from Debian > Installer p

pinjaman tanpa agunan 5 hari saja..

2008-05-11 Thread windy09
Pinjaman uang tunai tanpa agunan dari hsbc memberikan kemudahan bagi anda untuk mendapatkannya dengan persyaratan yang sangat mudah dan flexible cukup dengan fc ktp dan fc credit card (sisi depannya saja), fc billing tagihan 1 bulan terakhir (bila ada) dan bunga yang sangat kompetitif ,proses hing

kildclient_2.7.0-1, Rebuild against latest libperl5.10 fixes #480499, i386 m68k

2008-05-11 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
I'm the maintainer (but I'm not a DD) of the KildClient package, which uses libperl. Recently a new version of the package has been uploaded to the archive. However, for some of the architectures (the ones in which the build started first, as it seems) the package was build with version 5.8 of

asterisk/powerpc was built within a broken chroot and can't go to testing

2008-05-11 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, I just noticed asterisk doesn't want to go to testing, because it depends on powerpc on libtonezone1 (>= 1:1.4.10) - which however isn't in Debian yet (but only 1:1.4.10~dfsg*). Please make sure in future all of your packages are built within a clean chroot (i.e. only binary packages comming

Re: kildclient_2.7.0-1, Rebuild against latest libperl5.10 fixes #480499, i386 m68k

2008-05-11 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've built the program against libperl5.10 and saw that it works > fine, no changes to the program are necessary, nor to the debian > package. The only thing I need is to request a rebuild of the package > from source for i386 and m68k. I've s

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Please give-back lyx-1.5.4-2 on mips and powerpc

2008-05-11 Thread Per Olofsson
Hi, Sven Hoexter wrote: > The build on mips was successfull this time but the powerpc build > on voltaire failed again. Honestly I've no clue why it stuck and > subsequently got killed again. The powerpc build of 1.5.4-1 was also on voltaire, but it used gcc 4.2. This time gcc 4.3 was used, and i

Re: Testing migration doesn't check build-depends?

2008-05-11 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Steve Langasek [Sat, 10 May 2008 23:03:25 -0700]: > That wouldn't be a good idea unless we first get support for keeping > old library packages around in testing to allow asynchronous transitions. > Otherwise, testing transitions would become far more brittle than they > currently are. Oh, poi

Re: Testing migration doesn't check build-depends?

2008-05-11 Thread Luk Claes
Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Steve Langasek [Sat, 10 May 2008 23:03:25 -0700]: > >> That wouldn't be a good idea unless we first get support for keeping >> old library packages around in testing to allow asynchronous transitions. >> Otherwise, testing transitions would become far more brittle than th

Re: Testing migration doesn't check build-depends?

2008-05-11 Thread Andreas Barth
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080511 19:09]: > Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Steve Langasek [Sat, 10 May 2008 23:03:25 -0700]: > > > >> That wouldn't be a good idea unless we first get support for keeping > >> old library packages around in testing to allow asynchronous transitions. > >> Otherwis

Re: Testing migration doesn't check build-depends?

2008-05-11 Thread Luk Claes
Andreas Barth wrote: > * Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080511 19:09]: >> Adeodato Simó wrote: >>> * Steve Langasek [Sat, 10 May 2008 23:03:25 -0700]: >>> That wouldn't be a good idea unless we first get support for keeping old library packages around in testing to allow asynchronous tran

Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?

2008-05-11 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 07:44:48PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:32:35AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > > nvidia-graphics-drivers was removed from testing ten months ago.[0] > > New versions cannot transition to testing because of dependencies > > on modules which are only buil

Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?

2008-05-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:17:20 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > Will the MX400 still be supported under Lenny? nvidia-kernel-169.12 > doesn't seem to have the MX400 as a supported card. > Why the hell do you think this list is the proper place to ask about nvidia's marketing plans? Amazed, Juli

Re: openssl 0.9.8g-9

2008-05-11 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Kurt Roeckx [Wed, 07 May 2008 21:09:15 +0200]: > I've just uploaded openssl 0.9.8g-9 which contains an important security > fix. Please let it migrate to testing. This has been unblocked by aba after ack from D-I team. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net

Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?

2008-05-11 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 12 May 2008 01:17:20 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > Will the MX400 still be supported under Lenny? nvidia-kernel-169.12 > doesn't seem to have the MX400 as a supported card. If such a card only works with the proprietary NVIDIA driver then it isn't "supported" in the first place. Presum

Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?

2008-05-11 Thread Mike Bird
On Sun May 11 2008 11:58:11 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:17:20 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > Will the MX400 still be supported under Lenny? nvidia-kernel-169.12 > > doesn't seem to have the MX400 as a supported card. > > Why the hell do you think this list is the proper pl

please unblock debian-edu-install

2008-05-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, debian-edu-install is blocked, because it contains a udeb, which is not used by (Debians) debian-installer (atm). Please unblock it (even though it still has to wait 9 more days...) Thanks, Holger pgpEpg4pZac6H.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Testing migration doesn't check build-depends?

2008-05-11 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Le May 11, 2008 01:18:07 pm Andreas Barth, vous avez écrit : > * Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080511 19:09]: > > Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > * Steve Langasek [Sat, 10 May 2008 23:03:25 -0700]: > > >> That wouldn't be a good idea unless we first get support for keeping > > >> old library packages a

Re: When is the feature freeze for Lenny?

2008-05-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Does anyone have a rough idea when the feature freeze for Lenny is going to > be? That is when the new upstream releases are not going to be allowed any > more? The packages that I am interested are guile-1.8-libs, texmacs (i.e. > they are not base packages). We

Re: Testing migration doesn't check build-depends?

2008-05-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 07:57:53PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > If that's all what Steve meant, I'm not convinced that checking build-deps > would make testing transitions "far more brittle". I *guess* it would make > transitions at worst 20% harder. 20% harder is at least 30% too much. > I