Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Daniel Rus Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 18:28]:
I'd prefer to contact the upstream author and suggest them to use the
current:revision:age schema.
I am afraid this will take much longer than is need for getting the gfortran
transition into lenny.
On Mon, 04 Feb 08 12:40, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Good question.
> > At least for KDE 4 Apps there is no Problem -- kdesu from KDE 4 is
> > always around if kdelibs5 (the KDE 4 libraries) is installed.
> > When you have a KDE 3 Desktop kdebase-bin is no
Am Montag, den 04.02.2008, 23:32 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:46:05PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
>
> > please schedule a binNMU for gst0.10-python on all archs against
> > libgstreamer0.10-0 (>= 0.10.17) and libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 (>=
> > 0.10.17). The ol
Today a version of imlib11¹ built against libgif4 was uploaded to
unstable, and I noticed that it can't be installed because emacs21,
emacs22-gtk and icewm all depend on libungif4g (>= 4.1.4) which
conflicts against libgif4.
Although libgif4 provides libungif4g, this does not help much, since
dpkg
On 2008-02-05, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today a version of imlib11¹ built against libgif4 was uploaded to
> unstable, and I noticed that it can't be installed because emacs21,
woops. My fault I guess. didn't put that much into the change. I can
also revert imlib11 if preferred by
On 2008-02-05 17:50 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-02-05, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Today a version of imlib11¹ built against libgif4 was uploaded to
>> unstable, and I noticed that it can't be installed because emacs21,
>
> woops. My fault I guess. didn't put that much into
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:58:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Montag, den 04.02.2008, 23:32 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:46:05PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > > please schedule a binNMU for gst0.10-python on all archs against
> > > libgstreamer0.10-0 (>
[Please CC me on replies. Thanks]
Dear release team,
Please bump the urgency of firebird2.0/2.0.3.12981.ds1-5, uploaded some
hours ago, to "high" as it closes security bug. Here's the changelog
since -4, which migrated today (yay!)
firebird2.0 (2.0.3.12981.ds1-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Re
Hi release team,
can you please approve loop-aes 3.2b-1lenny1 in t-p-u?
This basically resurrects 3.1b-2 (which was previously
in testing) for d-i beta1 -
loop-aes (3.2b-1lenny1) testing; urgency=low
.
* Resurrect modules for 2.6.22-3.
.
* This package was previously removed from testi
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:23:56PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> can you please approve loop-aes 3.2b-1lenny1 in t-p-u?
Hint added.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Debian Release Assis
Hi,
please hint user-setup 1.18; it fixes an important regression brought in
with 1.17.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCR
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Please remove dcc. For more details see:
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00172.html
>
> Ack for the removal. Upstream told us that the outdated version in
> Etch causes serious problems inside the DCC network and upgrading
> to a new version is not
Sven Joachim wrote:
> I have another idea: let giflib build a dummy package libungif4g that
> depends on libgif4 and version the `Conflicts' and `Replaces' of libgif4 on
> libungif4g. That way libgif4 could work around the lack of versioned
> `Provides' in dpkg, and there's no hurry to update all
Hi
Please schedule binNMUs for all reverse dependencies of libpcre3 on all
architectures. There seems to be an ABI change in the last upstream:
dep-wait (libpcre3-dev >= 7.6-1)
Cheers
Luk
Original Message
Subject: Bug#463413: problem solved by recompiling the package !
Resent-
Hi,
On Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 07:44:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please hint user-setup 1.18; it fixes an important regression brought in
> with 1.17.
unblocked.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer |
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:53:47AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >> Please remove dcc. For more details see:
> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00172.html
> >
> > Ack for the removal. Upstream told us that the outdated version in
> > Etch causes serious
16 matches
Mail list logo