Please hint gpe-mininet and gpe-conf to go into testing together (this
should be the last hint needed for this transition).
Thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: Open
* Neil Williams [Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:31:14 +]:
> Please hint gpe-mininet and gpe-conf to go into testing together (this
> should be the last hint needed for this transition).
Hinted, we'll see how it goes.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:17:06PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> At this point, all but one of ICU's reverse build dependencies have
> been uploaded with dependencies on the new versions. The only
> exception is boost, and an RC bug was already reported 8 days ago. I
> guess at this poin
Hi all,
Clamav upstream is releasing the new version tomorrow, which will
include a soname change. This means, unhappily, a small library
transition. The affected packages are (source package names):
avscan
clamcour
claws-mail
dansguardian
gurlchecker
havp
klamav
php-clamavlib
python-clamav
syl
Hi all,
It has recently come to my attention that clamav in etch contains code
that is effectively a port of the unrar-nonfree code base. This code is
obviously not GPL compatible, and so it looks to me like we are
currently distributing something that we don't have permission to
distribute.
W
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately I am having connectivity problems, I am changing DSL
> provider and (almost) anybody in Italy knows how much painful is such
> a change.
>
> Please take care of boost wrt ICU and any other important issue it
> might have.
>
> Best regard
Hi,
apt looks almost ready to transition with all that's related to it.
Current blockers are (AFAICT):
- python-apt: 9 of 10 days old
- synaptic: 9 of 10 days old
- libept: 1 of 10 days old + missing on 4 arches
libept was uploaded yesterday with a minor (shlib deps) change to fix a bug
in the
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately I am having connectivity problems, I am changing DSL
>> provider and (almost) anybody in Italy knows how much painful is such
>> a change.
>>
>> Please take care of boost wrt ICU and any other important issue i
Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> apt looks almost ready to transition with all that's related to it.
>
> Current blockers are (AFAICT):
> - python-apt: 9 of 10 days old
> - synaptic: 9 of 10 days old
> - libept: 1 of 10 days old + missing on 4 arches
>
> libept was uploaded yesterday with a minor (shl
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately I am having connectivity problems, I am changing DSL
>>> provider and (almost) anybody in Italy knows how much painful is such
>>> a change.
>>>
>>> Please take care o
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's already bumped with urgency (2 days) by Steve ...
After APT moves to testing, we'll break ABI of it again on sid :(
We've pending things fixed for uploading and some other Ubuntu changes
for merging too.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Hi,
please requeue bin-NMUs of openoffice.org-voikko on all archs to rebuild
it against OOo 2.3.1.
TIA.
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 454605 patch
thanks
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 01:45:45PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I hadn't looked carefully at the packages yet. Now that I am looking
> at it, I see clearly from the changelog that 1.34.1-3 was an ABI
> change, so you're right -- I definitely don't want to upload it.
> (
> The attached patch looks to me like it does the necessary handling of
> switching to gcc-4.2 without breaking the ABI. I'm still going through the
> QA on it, but so far it looks sane; if anyone notices a problem with it,
> please let me know, otherwise I'll plan to NMU once I have a good build
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It's already bumped with urgency (2 days) by Steve ...
>
> After APT moves to testing, we'll break ABI of it again on sid :(
> We've pending things fixed for uploading and some other Ubuntu changes
> for merging too.
Unfortunate
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:51:35AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Unfortunately is not going to happen as soon as we wanted due to a new
> aptitude upload...
This kind of scenario made me think... would it make sense to publish in
a fixed location a machine-readable scenario of current ongoing
transit
Dear Daniel,
I'd like to ask you to postpone any other aptitude upload, for sid,
until we're moved current APT to testing since we do want to move
forward with APT on sid but d-i and other things need this (0.7.9)
version to be available ASAP.
Cheers,
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ot
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:02:09AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:51:35AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Unfortunately is not going to happen as soon as we wanted due to a new
> > aptitude upload...
> This kind of scenario made me think... would it make sense to publish in
>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:39:20AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > The attached patch looks to me like it does the necessary handling of
> > switching to gcc-4.2 without breaking the ABI. I'm still going through the
> > QA on it, but so far it looks sane; if anyone notices a problem with it,
> >
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:46:22PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk to build against apache2 2.2.6-3, which
> is already installed for all architectures.
Scheduled.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Develope
(this is an expansion of a reply I dashed off earlier to Otavio on my
way to dinner)
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:42:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> I'd like to ask you to postpone any other aptitude upload, for sid,
> until we're moved current APT to testin
21 matches
Mail list logo
