Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

2007-10-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 08 octobre 2007 à 15:59 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : > > The following packages need a round of binNMUs as soon as possible, to > > build extensions for python2.5, after which they shouldn't bother us. > > Can anyone schedule the binNMUs please? > > bitpim > > Please don't bothe

Re: Problem with grass built on sparc (RELOADED)

2007-10-11 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:20:05PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Could someone check why the recently built grass 6.2.2-2 on sparc is not yet > installed, so preventing 6.2.2 entering lenny? > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=grass;ver=6.2.2-2;arch=sparc;stamp=1190857559 > Sigh,

Please move multipath-tools to testing

2007-10-11 Thread Guido Guenther
Hi, http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=multipath-tools tells me that multipath-tools is blocked by a freeze (was this announced on debian-announce?) from testing. The package fixes some serious problems in the current version in testing (#440206, #439126) and is need for d-i support, could yo

Re: [SRM] multipath-tools-boot should run after udev

2007-10-11 Thread Guido Guenther
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:44:54PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > You should upload with a minimal patch against etch to proposed-updates. > The version number you propose is fine. I also added a fix for a serious upgrade problem when the daemon isn't running (#439126), the package is waiting for appro

Re: Please move multipath-tools to testing

2007-10-11 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=multipath-tools > tells me that multipath-tools is blocked by a freeze (was this announced > on debian-announce?) from testing. The package fixes some serious

Re: Please move multipath-tools to testing

2007-10-11 Thread Luk Claes
Guido Guenther wrote: Hi, http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=multipath-tools tells me that multipath-tools is blocked by a freeze (was this announced on debian-announce?) from testing. The package fixes some serious problems in the current version in testing (#440206, #439126) and is need f

Re: Problem with grass built on sparc (RELOADED)

2007-10-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 13:45:40 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:20:05PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Could someone check why the recently built grass 6.2.2-2 on sparc is not yet > > installed, so preventing 6.2.2 entering lenny? > > > > http://buildd

Re: Gsl in testing

2007-10-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Gudjon, On 11 October 2007 at 14:05, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: | Hi Dirk |I was reading the package homepage for Gsl. Is there any way to push Gsl | into Testing? There may be, but I as the 'mere maintainer' am not in a position to push. Gsl is being held back by the 'ldbl' transition, a

Re: Problem with grass built on sparc (RELOADED)

2007-10-11 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:51:16PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 13:45:40 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:20:05PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > Could someone check why the recently built grass 6.2.2-2 on sparc is not > >

Re: Gsl in testing

2007-10-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:20:23 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > Gudjon, > > On 11 October 2007 at 14:05, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: > | Hi Dirk > |I was reading the package homepage for Gsl. Is there any way to push Gsl > | into Testing? > > There may be, but I as the 'mere maintain

hint taktuk and kanif into testing

2007-10-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Could someone hint taktuk/3.3-1 and kanif/1.1-1 together into testing? hint taktuk/3.3-1 kanif/1.1-1 *should* do it;) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: hint taktuk and kanif into testing

2007-10-11 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:00:04 +0200]: > Hi, > Could someone hint taktuk/3.3-1 and kanif/1.1-1 together into testing? > hint taktuk/3.3-1 kanif/1.1-1 (Actually, s/hint/easy/.) Done, thanks. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Develo

Re: Gsl in testing

2007-10-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Julien, Thanks for the info! On 11 October 2007 at 16:17, Julien Cristau wrote: | On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:20:23 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | > Gudjon, | > | > On 11 October 2007 at 14:05, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: | > | Hi Dirk | > |I was reading the package homepage for G

Debian Installer Status Update - October 11th 2007

2007-10-11 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 = New stuff = * win32-loader has been added to daily CD images and is now used for autorun too; * multipath-udeb and libaio1-udeb have been introduced but are being excluded from CD builds since they're not being used yet; * dhcp-client-udeb

Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

2007-10-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Still, it would be nice to build extensions for all python versions, but > the fact they are private makes this process more complicated. ... particularly given that neither python-support (which BitPim currently uses) nor python-central actually sup

zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6

2007-10-11 Thread Mark Brown
Please allow zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6 into testing. It fixes cross compilation and has been in unstable for ten days: zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=low * Configure the compiler and linker to use for the vanilla build too so that cross compilation works (closes: #444727). -- Mark

Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

2007-10-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 à 14:44 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : > Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Still, it would be nice to build extensions for all python versions, but > > the fact they are private makes this process more complicated. > > ... particularly given that neither

ICU 3.8 (boost status)

2007-10-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I've been trying to monitor the boost transition in hopes of being able to upload ICU 3.8 once it goes in. It looks like it's getting really close. Is that correct? I'm quite eager to go ahead and get ICU 3.8 uploaded to unstable because there are several other things that are waiting for this

Re: zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6

2007-10-11 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please allow zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6 into testing. It fixes cross > compilation and has been in unstable for ten days: > > zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=low > > * Configure the compiler and linker

Re: zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6

2007-10-11 Thread Luk Claes
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:46:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Please allow zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6 into testing. It fixes cross > compilation and has been in unstable for ten days: > > zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=low > > * Configure the compiler and linker to use for the vanilla bu

Re: Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11

2007-10-11 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Luk, At 9 Oct 07 12:57:40 GMT, Luk Claes wrote: > >> Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11. > >> > >> This package has CJK fonts are needed for newer d-i. > >> I believe it's safe to unfreeze this package usually because > >> this udeb package is rel

Re: Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11

2007-10-11 Thread Luk Claes
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 08:04:16AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Luk, Hi Kenshi > At 9 Oct 07 12:57:40 GMT, > Luk Claes wrote: > > >> Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact 1.11. > > >> > > >> This package has CJK fonts are needed for newer d-i. > > >

Re: Please hint libmtp, amarok and gnomad2 into testing

2007-10-11 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 14:30]: > Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > >Due to the upgrade libmtp5 -> libmtp6, the packages libmtp, amarok, and > >gnomad2 are stuck in unstable. Please, hint them into testing. > > Hint added. Nine days have passed and the situation did not improve: l

Re: Please hint libmtp, amarok and gnomad2 into testing

2007-10-11 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le October 12, 2007 01:40:01 am Rafael Laboissiere, vous avez écrit : > * Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 14:30]: > > Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > >Due to the upgrade libmtp5 -> libmtp6, the packages libmtp, amarok, and > > >gnomad2 are stuck in unstable. Please, hint them into testing.