Hi,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I haven't seen anybody claim that any of the *BSDs implemented rule 9
> that also says he tested it, I've only seen reported of FreeBSD saying
> it didn't.
I just tested this:
~/> uname -sr
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
~/> ping -c 1 ftp.us.debian.org | grep PING
PING ftp.us.debia
... to be rebuild against libsnmp15:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libfwbuilder7: Depends: libsnmp10 (>= 5.3.1) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG:
Hi,
rhythmbox needs a binNMU to be built against libtotem-plparser7:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
rhythmbox: Depends: libtotem-plparser1 (>= 2.17.5) but it is not
installable
E: Broken packages
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| ja
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:56:35AM +, Wolf Wiegand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen anybody claim that any of the *BSDs implemented rule 9
> > that also says he tested it, I've only seen reported of FreeBSD saying
> > it didn't.
>
> I just tested this:
>
> ~/> uname
Hi,
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > ~/> uname -sr
> > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
> > ~/> ping -c 1 ftp.us.debian.org | grep PING
> > PING ftp.us.debian.org (204.152.191.7): 56 data bytes
> > ~/> ping -c 1 ftp.us.debian.org | grep PING
> > PING ftp.us.debian.org (35.9.37.225): 56 data bytes
>
> rather use s
Hi,
usplash 0.5.2-3 is not in testing, even though it is in unstable for 82 days,
has no RC bugs and it has been build on all 4 archs it's supposed to be
build.
I guess it's because of
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=usplash which states
"Package declares a build time de
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 14:19:29 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> usplash 0.5.2-3 is not in testing, even though it is in unstable for 82 days,
> has no RC bugs and it has been build on all 4 archs it's supposed to be
> build.
>
> I guess it's because of
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.p
Hello SRM,
Please remove bandersnatch [¹] from etch. It has security bugs bugs [²] and
upstream is MIA. I have already requeted its removal [³] from sid and was
previously removed from lenny.
[¹] http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bandersnatch.html
[²] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Hi,
the first round of T&S for RAs is done.
First of all, thank you all for participating in this, and thanks for
squashing bugs.
Survived until now have
Robert Edmonds
Julien Cristau
Pierre Habouzit
Neil McGovern (on the vacations list)
This week, we go into more details. As you can see from
Hi,
I'd like to get openssl 0.9.8e-9 into testing because of the security
fix.
Note that it's frozen because it contains an udeb.
#440538 might also affect the it's migration to testing, but I believe
I've just set it's state right. I have no reason to believe testing
doesn't have that problem.
package: ftp.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
On Saturday 29 September 2007 14:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > usplash 0.5.2-3 is not in testing, even though it is in unstable for 82
> > days, has no RC bugs and it has been build on all 4 archs it's supposed
> > to be build
simple-cdd is blocked from migrating into testing, presumably due to
it's udeb, which is not used by default in debian-installer. please
consider allowing it into testing, as it fixes all outstanding bugs on
simple-cdd.
thanks!
live well,
vagrant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 29/09/07 at 17:41 +0100, David wrote:
> I did not know about the existence of binNMU. Very interesting for sid,
> where transition periods may take several days :-)
>
> I read the wiki but I do not have it clear yet. May you post the mail you
> sent to request the binNMU? (I suppose I can abstr
I propose that packages depending on makedev for the purpose of creating
device nodes in /dev/[1] are modified to depend on "udev | makedev".
Most of them already do, there are about 10 packages which have not been
fixed yet (the only important one being gnupg).
Bugs have already been opened and on
Hi.
See below, looks like a binNMU on all archs but i386 would help player
binaries gets into the archive (although I don't really get why the
installed-on-the-mirror +b1 i386 binaries aren't listed by rmadison).
It builds at least fine in an uptodate i386 cowbuilder chroot.
- Forwarded mess
15 matches
Mail list logo
