Hi,
i will most probably not accept any further packages[1] for Debian Etch r1
after todays^Wtonights dinstall run, unless someone really convinces me
there is something very important missing. Exception are granted for
packages related to D-I or kernel, if not already uploaded.
Greetings
Marti
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 15:14 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> i will most probably not accept any further packages[1] for Debian Etch r1
> after todays^Wtonights dinstall run, unless someone really convinces me
> there is something very important missing. Exception are granted for
> p
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:42:29AM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:40:35PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > uploaded, sitting in the NEW queue.
> Now in incoming. :)
I don't suppose there is any chance of the rest of NEW being
looked at? libgeda has been waiting 2 wee
The release team requested email about proposed release goals for
Lenny. Here is one. I propose to switch to a dependency based SysV
boot system for Lenny, using the LSB headers in the init.d scripts to
decide the boot sequence. It is currently possible to convert
existing installations to do t
Hi,
On Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 17:02:50 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> The release team requested email about proposed release goals for
> Lenny. Here is one. I propose to switch to a dependency based SysV
> boot system for Lenny, using the LSB headers in the init.d scripts to
> decide the
Hi,
On Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 16:42:21 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 15:14 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > i will most probably not accept any further packages[1] for Debian Etch r1
> > after todays^Wtonights dinstall run, unless someone really convinc
[Martin Zobel-Helas]
> I second this release goal (as DD, not yet as RA; i leave that up to
> Luk and Andi to decide), and would propose "goal-bootseq" for
> user-tagging.
>
> Pere, do you know how many packages are currently buggy? How can we
> prevent new packages from becoming buggy?
We tag bu
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> Do you need more numbers?
While listening on the QA talk at debconf, it occured to me that
lintian.debian.org got numbers of the number of packages missing the
LSB header. http://lintian.debian.org/reports/tags.html> list
this related to the LSB headers:
init.d-script-h
Dear Release Team,
the TeX Task Force proposes the following release goal:
"No dependencies (Depends/Recommends/Suggests/Build-Depends{-Indep}) on
tetex-* and texlive-full, only justified dep's on texlive",
with the usertag-shortname "texlive-transition"
with the rationale:
,
| The tetex
The current python2.4 and python2.5 package in testing and unstable
are ready for the transition to python 2.5 as the default python
version. However many packages still need updates for python 2.5,
either as a rebuild to build an extension module for 2.5, or to fix a
problem with python2.5. To ea
Hi,
I'd like to do a mass-bug reporting about packages not being binNMU safe.
That's 1419 source packages that produce 2527 binary packages [1].
I'd like to coordinate my steps with you, as these are a lot of bugs,
and the release team suffer from binNMU un-safe packages.
1. A mail to -devel
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:10:58PM +0100, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> I'd like to do a mass-bug reporting about packages not being binNMU safe.
>
> That's 1419 source packages that produce 2527 binary packages [1].
Please see the followup discussion to the mail you originally cited,
http://lists.debian.
Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to do a mass-bug reporting about packages not being binNMU safe.
> That's 1419 source packages that produce 2527 binary packages [1].
> [1]
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tsubstvar-source-version-is-deprecated.html
That's not the lintian t
Hello stable release team
May I upload libdbi-perl_1.53-1etch1 to "stable-proposed-updates"?
It contains a backported 2-line patch for a "potential" dataloss
problem (confirmed in the changelog of 1.57) which turned out to be a
real problem as written by a user in the below quoted mail. I applie
Hi,
On Fri Jun 22, 2007 at 00:39:19 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello stable release team
>
> May I upload libdbi-perl_1.53-1etch1 to "stable-proposed-updates"?
>
> It contains a backported 2-line patch for a "potential" dataloss
> problem (confirmed in the changelog of 1.57) which turned
[Please keep discussion on -devel; -release is not a discussion list and
I'm not subscribed to -qa :-)]
Hi,
As discussed during DebConf, I'd like to propose a new release goal: Packages
should not only build in clean chroots, but also in non-clean environments.
Specifically, adding extra package
16 matches
Mail list logo
