Dear release team,
please schedule a binNMU of sobby_0.4.3-1 on all architectures with the
following dep-waits:
* libnet6-1.3-dev (>= 1:1.3.5-0)
* libobby-0.4-dev (>> 0.4.4-1)
Reasoning: obby had a wrong shlibs file which is fixed in the newest
sourceful upload. net6 includes an important fix
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:14:41PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> At debconf while experimenting with fai, I noticd that libapt-pkg-perl
> is uninstallable in lenny/unstable.
Only in unstable.
> It was a simple no change rebuild necessary to get it running. A binNMU
> seems fine to me.
Has al
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:59:49PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > against openoffice.org 2.2.1? No idea what you want to do with sparc,
> > as a bin-NMU there would still build agsinst 2.0.4(!).. Maybe a
> That's of course nonsense as the packages are not even installable
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:13:57PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> I should have figured out the change to symbol versioning was not
> required at all... so I agree in reverting it.
Great!
> > - Revert the Debian package names to the curl 7.15.5 versions. Because
> > compatibility has been r
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:04:09AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 16 juin 2007 à 21:40 +0100, Michael Bramer a écrit :
> > If you have questions, ask. (please use cc:)
>
> I have one question: how are handled searches (like apt-cache search and
> synaptic's search function) with those
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:59:49PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > against openoffice.org 2.2.1? No idea what you want to do with sparc,
> > > as a bin-NMU there would still build agsinst 2.0.4(!).. Maybe a
>
> > That's of course nonsense as the
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:48:37AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear release team,
> please schedule a binNMU of sobby_0.4.3-1 on all architectures with the
> following dep-waits:
> * libnet6-1.3-dev (>= 1:1.3.5-0)
> * libobby-0.4-dev (>> 0.4.4-1)
> Reasoning: obby had a wrong shlibs file whic
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 20:46]:
> Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> miss another backport from the trunk.
FWIW, xulrunner currently doesn't build with gcc-snapshot. I have not
investigated whether this is a bug in the compiler or xulrun
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:09:23PM -0400, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, except for the part where it's harder to keep broken package
> combinations from trickling into testing. :)
this could be achieved blocking curl in unstable until all the packages
depending on the broken libcurl4 are rebuilt...
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:13:57PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > - Drop the SSL-less variant of the library, which was not present in curl
> > 7.15.5; AFAICS, there is no use case where a user of curl *needs* to *not*
> > have SSL support, so this split seems to be unnecessary overhead.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 20:46]:
> > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > miss another backport from the trunk.
> FWIW, xulrunner currently doesn't build with gcc-snapshot
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:35:46PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:13:57PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > - Drop the SSL-less variant of the library, which was not present in curl
> > > 7.15.5; AFAICS, there is no use case where a user of curl *needs* to
> > > *
Am 2007-06-13 16:59:23, schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> If people were reading release notes, we wouldn't have this problem,
> as etch release notes ask users to install a 2.6 kernel already.
My problem is, that I have several Mainboards which refuse to
work with the Debian-Kernles and SMP compiled i
On 06/17/07 10:13, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-06-13 16:59:23, schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
If people were reading release notes, we wouldn't have this problem,
as etch release notes ask users to install a 2.6 kernel already.
My problem is, that I have several Mainboards which refuse to
work
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 05:13:56PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-06-13 16:59:23, schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> > If people were reading release notes, we wouldn't have this problem,
> > as etch release notes ask users to install a 2.6 kernel already.
>
> My problem is, that I have severa
* Pierre Habouzit [Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:48:10 +0100]:
> > My problem is, that I have several Mainboards which refuse to
> > work with the Debian-Kernles and SMP compiled in so there was
> > NO WAY to install a 2.6 kernel. (I had upgraded and reboted
> > but it does not more start with the new 2.6
Hi,
I have prepared an apache2 update for etch r1. It fixes two RC bugs
and adds some missing documentation. Here is the changelog:
apache2 (2.2.3-4+etch1) stable; urgency=low
* Comment out CacheEnable by default, to prevent filling up /var.
Document the problem in README.Debian and NEWS.
17 matches
Mail list logo
