Re: [SRM] kernel updates for oldstable

2007-05-28 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:35:47PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 02:34:19PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > > It seems to me that Frans may have been referring to whether it's > > > relevant to add other stuff into sarge's *debian-installer*. > > > > No, I wasn't, or at least not

Re: [SRM] kernel updates for oldstable

2007-05-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 18:54]: > Since there have been no objections so far, I'll proceed with > uploading these fixes to oldstable where they can be later rejected if > objections arise. The security fixes from kernel-image-2.6.8-i386_2.6.8-16sarge6_i386+source.changes are inc

Re: desktop-base for etchr1

2007-05-28 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Wed May 23, 2007 at 14:49:21 +0200, Lo?c Minier wrote: > Hi, > > I've uploaded desktop-base 4.0.2 yesterday with a fix for #422043 > prepared by Fathi Boudra. It's Arch: all. > > 1) please review the diff between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2 > 2) does it need to be hinted to testing befo

Re: [SRM] kernel updates for oldstable

2007-05-28 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:07:45PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070528 18:54]: > > Since there have been no objections so far, I'll proceed with > > uploading these fixes to oldstable where they can be later rejected if > > objections arise. > > The security fi

Re: desktop-base for etchr1

2007-05-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 29 mai 2007 à 00:04 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > I don't see the RCness of this bug. Please explain. Could you please explain what is the current policy for package inclusion in point releases? >From previous discussions with Andreas and Julien, I understood it was possible now