Pushing multi-arch media (Re: blockers for 64-bit adoption)

On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As for missinformation, I'm not sure what the general tendency would be, but > could it be that a lot of our users are unaware of 64-bit capability in > their cpu? I haven't been following lately on how skilled/e

Possible missing sync on the repositories

Good news that Debian 4.0r0 is out. One small thing to mention is that an update with Synaptic gives this warning: W: Conflicting distribution: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release (expected stable but got sarge) W: Conflicting distribution: http://ftp.ro.debian.org stable-proposed-

Re: 64-bit transition deadline (Re: Etch in the hands of the Stable Release Managers)

On Monday 09 April 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: you don't believe that software will continue to push forward our > minimum hardware requirements, the way it has for the past decade or so? > What do you think is the minimum memory required to run a "comfortable" > desktop system (or workstation) to

Re: Pushing multi-arch media (Re: blockers for 64-bit adoption)

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:49:30AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > As for missinformation, I'm not sure what the general tendency would be, but > > could it be that a lot of our users are unaware of 64-bit capabil