Would you allow some last minute changes to doc-base?

Hi, Yeah, I know it's probably too late for some non-RC fixes. Nevertheless I'd like to ask you if you would accept the following changes to the install-docs program. The first change is targeted for the future etch to lenny upgrades: Index: install-docs

Please consider ipmitool version 1.8.8-3 for etch

I just fixed a serious bug in ipmitool version 1.8.8-3, making sure the monitor starts as it should with a commonly used setting. Please consider accepting it into Etch. This is the changelog: ipmitool (1.8.8-3) unstable; urgency=low * Ported fix to ipmievd from upstream version 1.8.9 (Cl

Please approve update to xine-lib

Hi, I have been approached by upstream (Darren Salt) that there are some bad known crashers in xine-lib in testing. Therefore I prepared a very focused new upload, which is in unstable for some time. These crashers are "important" at least, so I personally think it was a good idea to have them in

unblock evolution-data-server/1.6.3-5

Hi, Please unblock eds 1.6.3-5, it fixes internal timezone files; the package is probably unusable in the US without these fixes. Bye, -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please consider unblock libgd-gd2-noxpm-perl 1:2.34-2

Wagner Bruna wrote: > Hello, Hi > This version fixes a dependency on xpm (bug #402546) that makes the > package useless. Would it be possible to unblock it? Sorry, we don't consider unblocking it at this stage of the release preparations. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

Florian Ernst wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 09:50:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> Florian Ernst wrote: >> Can you make an etch upload with only the removal of the buggy script? >>> >>> Just for clarity's sake, you mean uploading to testing-proposed-updates? >

Re: could wwwoffle be included in etch?

Paul Slootman wrote: > wwwoffle was removed from testing on 5th December due to a supposed > critical bug, which I and the upstream maintainer have discussed with > the reporter and we don't consider it a critical bug, considering that > the user had made a configuration change to invoke the behavi

Re: RC fix: asp 1.8-6 for etch

Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > please let asp 1.8-6 [1] into etch. Already entered testing in the mean time... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: Open

Re: Please unblock gtk-qt-engine 1:0.8~svn-rev31-3

Bastian Venthur wrote: > The current version in testing 0.7 has some rather ugly bugs which are > fixed in unstable's 0.8-branch. > > 0.8 branch is in unstable for 4 months now and I'm pretty confident, > that no RC bugs are introduced from 0.7 to 0.8. I've reviewed every > patch since 0.7 (some o

Re: etch: rc bug#416755 - git-core

Gerrit Pape wrote: > Hi, while not that severe IMO, #416755 is a policy violation. > > I prepared a trivial fix, but have limited access to my gpg key due to > moving house. > > Pleasy, anyone, build, sign, upload, and approve git-core 1:1.4.4.4-3 > from > > http://people.debian.org/~pape/Ou4he

Re: Please unblock ulogd 1.23-8

Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Please unblock ulogd 1.23-9 for etch, hopefully the last etch-targetted > release. It containts a new translation (Dutch) and a trivial > documentation fix. Sorry, at this stage of the release preparations we only consider packages that fix RC bugs in etch anymore. So, no

Re: New GRUB package suitable for Etch

Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello, > > Please do a check on > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub/news/20070330T133202Z.html since > I've upload a new grub package and it fixes a very annoying bug. unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Finge

Re: Please unblock gtk-qt-engine 1:0.8~svn-rev31-3

Luk Claes schrieb: > Bastian Venthur wrote: >> The current version in testing 0.7 has some rather ugly bugs which are >> fixed in unstable's 0.8-branch. >> >> 0.8 branch is in unstable for 4 months now and I'm pretty confident, >> that no RC bugs are introduced from 0.7 to 0.8. I've reviewed every

Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

martin f krafft wrote: > #416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into > etch? If so, urgency=high upload? Sorry, but it will very probably not be considered anymore... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25

Re: Question about the removal of libpod-pom-perl

Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > It appears that libpod-pom-perl was removed a few months ago. The > removal hint says RoQA, but I can't find any other information. > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpod-pom-perl/news/20061230T233915Z.html > > There were no bugs against it (other than a single

Re: Please unblock nullmailer 1:1.03-5

Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock nullmailer 1:1.03-5, it contains german and spanish > debconf translation updates. Sorry, we only consider packages fixing RC bugs in etch anymore. So, not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7

Re: Please unblock xfingerd and ogre-contrib

Mohammed Sameer wrote: > Can you please unblock them ? I've fixed their RC bugs. > I've also subscribed to their PTS in case of problems. Sorry, we don't consider adding packages to etch at this stage of the release preparations anymore. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk

Re: Please unblock xfingerd and ogre-contrib

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:18:25PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > Can you please unblock them ? I've fixed their RC bugs. > > I've also subscribed to their PTS in case of problems. > > Sorry, we don't consider adding packages to etch at this stage of the release > preparation

Re: pound for etch

Jordi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:32AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: >> Well, that package is quite OK and surely with minimal changes. > > I can upload tonight if finally my ADSL link is working. > >> What I would greatly prefer, however, is for the 2.2.7-2 version to go >> in. I know

Re: Please consider multisync0.90_0.91.0-3 for etch

Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > the state of phone/pda-syncing software is a bit miserable in Etch right > now. > > The old multisync source package is still available, but it is > unmaintained upstream, and the syncml and palm plugins had to be removed > due to RC bugs and nobody porting them to

Re: Please unblock xfingerd and ogre-contrib

* Mohammed Sameer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070404 20:23]: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:18:25PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > > Can you please unblock them ? I've fixed their RC bugs. > > > I've also subscribed to their PTS in case of problems. > > > > Sorry, we don't consider

Re: X.Org unblocks

Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded these three packages today, could you add unblock hints? > > # bug#417564 > unblock xorg/1:7.1.0-16 > # CVE-2007-1667 > unblock libx11/2:1.0.3-7 > # CVE-2007-1351 CVE-2007-1352 > unblock libxfont/1:1.2.2-2 All unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - ht

Re: Would you allow some last minute changes to doc-base?

Robert Luberda wrote: > Hi, > > > Yeah, I know it's probably too late for some non-RC fixes. > Nevertheless I'd like to ask you if you would accept the > following changes to the install-docs program. Sorry, too late indeed, we are not considering packages that don't fix RC bugs in etch anym

Re: Please consider ipmitool version 1.8.8-3 for etch

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I just fixed a serious bug in ipmitool version 1.8.8-3, making sure > the monitor starts as it should with a commonly used setting. Please > consider accepting it into Etch. This is the changelog: Already in testing for i386 and amd64. > ipmitool (1.8.8-3) unstabl

Re: Please approve update to xine-lib

Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi, > > I have been approached by upstream (Darren Salt) that there are some bad > known crashers in xine-lib in testing. Therefore I prepared a very > focused new upload, which is in unstable for some time. These crashers > are "important" at least, so I personally think

Re: unblock evolution-data-server/1.6.3-5

Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > Please unblock eds 1.6.3-5, it fixes internal timezone files; the > package is probably unusable in the US without these fixes. unblocked, though not built and uploaded on all architectures yet... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk -

Re: Please unblock xfingerd and ogre-contrib

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:36:07PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Mohammed Sameer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070404 20:23]: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:18:25PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > > > Can you please unblock them ? I've fixed their RC bugs. > > > > I've also subscr

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:37:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Florian Ernst wrote: > > RMs, please accept blender_2.42a-5etch1. Debdiffs attached. > > It will be approved if the mips and sparc builds get built and uploaded in > time... Of course, it needs to be autobuilt on all archs. However, is

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

Florian Ernst wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:37:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Florian Ernst wrote: >>> RMs, please accept blender_2.42a-5etch1. Debdiffs attached. >> It will be approved if the mips and sparc builds get built and uploaded in >> time... > > Of course, it needs to be autobuil

Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 12:06:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > #416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into > etch? If so, urgency=high upload? BTW, according to the udev maintainer on IRC, this is not an appropriate solution because it is an abuse of a non-public udev i

Re: please unblock icedove 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-3

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 07:45:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02/04/2007): > > In what sense has this patch been "improved"? I'm concerned about > > "improving" patches that are already working for the other mozilla > > packages, so soon before release. >

Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.04.04.2256 +0200]: > BTW, according to the udev maintainer on IRC, this is not an > appropriate solution because it is an abuse of a non-public udev > interface. BTW, that udev maintainer, with all due respect, could really talk to me and/or the

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:40:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Florian Ernst wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:37:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >> Florian Ernst wrote: > >>> RMs, please accept blender_2.42a-5etch1. Debdiffs attached. > >> It will be approved if the mips and sparc builds get buil

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (I)

Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r6 = An up-to-date version is at . We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can actually comme

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

Florian Ernst wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:40:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Florian Ernst wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:37:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Florian Ernst wrote: > RMs, please accept blender_2.42a-5etch1. Debdiffs attached. It will be approved if the mips a

Re: Unblock xulrunner and tabextensions

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyways, 1.8.0.11-2 uploaded, with a new tabextensions, too, that > removes "Iceweasel" from the description. You may want to unblock both. xulrunner got in, many thanks. Could you also hint tabextensions ? Mike

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:12:50PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Florian Ernst wrote: > > I'd very much like to see a build log from an *updated* testing system > > on sparc and mips. If it still FTBFS I'll start to investigate asap. > > So you did try to build it on mips and sparc on testing and the

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > On the other hand, the toolchain is frozen for quite some time and > identical both in testing and unstable, and blender_2.42a-6 which is > identical code-wise to -5etch1 has built on all archs, including mips > and sparc, without any

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:42:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > > On the other hand, the toolchain is frozen for quite some time and > > identical both in testing and unstable, and blender_2.42a-6 which is > > identical code-wise to

Re: Bug#416658: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

On Apr 04, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, that udev maintainer, with all due respect, could really talk > to me and/or the bug report about these things. I cannot discuss bugs I do not know about, somebody talked about using udevtrigger for this on some channel and I explained h

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:59:04AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:42:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > > > On the other hand, the toolchain is frozen for quite some time and > > > identical both in testin

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007, Luk Claes wrote: > Apparantly blender FTBFS on these archs, so finding out why it fails (and > maybe fixing it) might help. It fails because it incorrectly tries to link with libstdc++, which should never be done directly. Patch attached. -- Sam. diff -puriN blender-2.4