upload new sipcalc upstream release

Hi, I would like to upload a new upstream release of sipcalc. The release is a minor code cleanup that fixes compile warnings. The packaging fixes a checklib notice. Sipcalc does not have any reverse dependencies so the upload should be ok, but I am asking just to be sure. Thanks, Adriaan Peeter

Permission for new upstream version of flamerobin

Dear release managers, I'd like to upload new upstream version of flamerobin. Etch/sid currently have 0.7.5-2, I'd like to get 0.7.6-1 there. Sarge has no flamerobin. Changes are small (http://flamerobin.org/releases/0.7.6.html) and 0.7.6 is well tested (by me and others) and should be fine for

May I upload quilt?

Resending this message to the right address this time. I hope I didn't flood anyone's box with my previous attempt. Bye, Mt. PS: please CC me on replies - Forwarded message from Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:06:45 +0100 From: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTE

Please consider migrating kernel-package to testing ...

Hi dear RM team, Please consider hinting kernel-package to move into testing. The current version in testing is still victim of 391643, which made the built kernel packages uninstallable with : Missing Required paramater 'Old' at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.19-rc5-efika1.postinst line

Upload of digikam & digikamimageplugins

debian-release, The pkg-kde-extras team intend to upload an update to digikam & digikamimageplugins. Both are mainly upstream bug fixes and move the packages from a beta3 to a rc1 version and quality. There are no rdepends, and it is anticipated that both packages will migrate to etch in the n

Please, allow upload of zope 2.9.6

Dear RMs, zope 2.9.6 has been released a few days ago. I ask here for the permission to upload it to unstable, and then let it migrate to testing for the etch release. This is a bug fixing release, so I do not see any reason to release with zope 2.9.5 instead of this one. If any important bug

Re: Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:23:13AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > > This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep > > directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional > > problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't. > T

Re: Asking for the position of the RMs about the powerpc d-i situation.

Hi, On Wednesday 22 November 2006 18:22, Sven Luther wrote: > I know that you maybe defavorably biased against me in the petty dispute > between me and frans and joeyh some unnamed others, over the powerpc port > of d-i. > > But, we are nearing the release, and the actions of Frans are clearly > e

I wanted to fix that.

I reflected afterward: "Why not? I've been there ever since. Apparently I know how to read the Baseball Writers' Association of America voters when it comes to managers a lot better than I read them. 5 *** CNHC *** CNHC *** CNHC *** Trade Date: Friday, November 24, 2006 Company: China Healt

please hint libpng 1.2.13-4 (with udeb)

Hello, Please hint libpng 1.2.13-4 (with udeb). It fixes CVE-2006-5793 and CVE-2006-3334. The new changelog entries (not in etch) are: libpng (1.2.13-4) unstable; urgency=low * Removed drop_pass_width patch. Closes: #399499. libpng (1.2.13-3) unstable; urgency=low * libpng12-dev: removed