On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:03:34PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> There seems to have been a screw-up in handling of mailman security
> and stable updates: There are two different mailman packages in Debian
> with version number 2.1.5-8sarge3.
> -8sarge3 maintainer update (that got frozen wa
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > Stable release team, please react accordingly; you may for example
> > do a binary sourceless NMU for the architectures that have -8sarge3
> > the security update so that they all have -8sarge3 the maintainer
> > update.
> I h
Hi! (CC: my if necessary, I'm not subscribed here)
Joey asked me to forward this to here, so here it is:
When upgrading sarge to etch, apt-get complains about untrusted source of
packages because gnupg isn't installed during apt-get dist-upgrade.
After manually installing gnupg && apt-get updat
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:38:17PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >0.3.7pre-4, however, did build on alpha, arm, ia64, m68k and s390, and the
> >corresponding binaries are still in unstable. The maintainer has already
> >requested their removal (#385781) a few days ago, so it's currently waiting
>
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060906 13:52]:
>> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Andreas Barth wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I try to summarize the results of the discussion from start of August,
>> >> in hope that we can
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:45:27PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> linux-2.6 2.6.17-8 has finally been successfully built on all
> architectures.
> We have currently 3 RC-bugs left, 2 of them (#242866, #383481) concern
> firmware blobs and should be addressed after the GRs. The third RC-bug
> (#
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Joey asked me to forward this to here, so here it is:
>
> When upgrading sarge to etch, apt-get complains about untrusted source of
> packages because gnupg isn't installed during apt-get dist-upgrade.
> After manually installing gnupg && apt-get update everything seem
Hi all,
the last upload of iso-codes (0.53-1, frozen because of a udeb) has been in
unstable for 10 days. If the D-I team has no objections, it could be hinted
into testing now.
Regards,
Tobias
--
Tobias Toedter | The following statement is not true.
Hamburg, Germany | The previous statemen
Hi,
what we have as of today is a nice tool we can use to
(a) list the packages on the website, and
(b) have an easy way for ftp-masters to move things to proposed-updates.
What we else need is generate a list of
(a) changes-files for ftp-masters to installed during point-release (or
do ftp-maste
* Martin Schulze:
> Imho, it's more useful to upload 2.1.5-8sarge4 and only bump the
> version number to get the new version built for all architectures into
> the archive.
While you are at it, you could also include this patch:
Revision: 8001
http://svn.sourceforge.net/mailman/?rev=80
Quoting Tobias Toedter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
>
> the last upload of iso-codes (0.53-1, frozen because of a udeb) has been in
> unstable for 10 days. If the D-I team has no objections, it could be hinted
> into testing now.
iso-codes udeb is used only by localechooser and in initrd so
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:44:14PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > the last upload of iso-codes (0.53-1, frozen because of a udeb) has been in
> > unstable for 10 days. If the D-I team has no objections, it could be hinted
> > into testing now.
> iso-codes udeb is used only by localechooser
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:07:32AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Hi! (CC: my if necessary, I'm not subscribed here)
> Joey asked me to forward this to here, so here it is:
> When upgrading sarge to etch, apt-get complains about untrusted source of
> packages because gnupg isn't installed dur
Several days ago, I asked whether it would be okay to upload a new
version of ICU with an soname bump. Other than a message from the
boost maintainer that he would be tracking ICU and would upload a new
boost as soon as the new ICU appeared, I haven't heard anything. I'm
not sure whether I'm sup
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:07:32AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
>> When upgrading sarge to etch, apt-get complains about untrusted source
>> of
>> packages because gnupg isn't installed during apt-get dist-upgrade.
>> After manually installing gnupg && apt-get update eve
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:00:53PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> before uploading gnome-vfs2 2.16.0 to experimental, I've noticed that a
> few functions were removed from the public interface and moved to
> libbonobo.
> Here is the list of affected packages:
> evolution: /usr/lib/evolu
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:07:32AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Hi! (CC: my if necessary, I'm not subscribed here)
>
> Joey asked me to forward this to here, so here it is:
>
> When upgrading sarge to etch, apt-get complains about untrusted source of
> packages because gnupg isn't installed
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:34:35PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:07:32AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> >> When upgrading sarge to etch, apt-get complains about untrusted source
> >> of
> >> packages because gnupg isn't installed during a
Hey Debian-release!.!
http://www.geocities.com/claudine1006713469
." *Cambi: Bce, euro/dollaro a 1,2800 (1,2762) - 14.37"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.07.1321 +0200]:
> Could you please give a thumbs-up on mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-2
> migrating into etch, please? It's blocked because of the udeb...
Hm, #385994 is RC (I just bumped it to serious).
I'll upload -3 with urgency high becaus
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:44:53PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> libsp-gxmlcpp1c2a: Depends: libcppunit-1.10-2c2a
> - needs a +b1 built against libcppunit-1.12
Scheduled.
> gcompris: Depends: libslang2 (>= 2.0.6-3) but 2.0.6-2 is to be installed
> - needs either a +b1 built against the slang2 in
21 matches
Mail list logo
