Re: We can force in tetex-base, we just need a better hint

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 02:23:42AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Steve, please try changing the hint as follows: > force tetex-base/3.0-13 > hint tetex-base/3.0-13 tetex-bin/3.0-13 Ah, fair enough; hint changed. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Fre

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (I)

Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi Joey, > > there was some discussion[1] wether the next stable update could have some > timezone data updated in the glibc package. Show me the changes. Unless large chunks of the world are affected I don't consider timezone details to warrant an update in our stabl

Re: Bug#350501: nscd: [hppa] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x42

On 2/9/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > > Good catch, I completely forgot about that one, I thought it was > > already merged in. > > Thibaut, there is something strange about this bugreport, it seems > to prevent glibc

Re: Bug#350501: nscd: [hppa] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x42

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > On 2/9/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > > > Good catch, I completely forgot about that one, I thought it was > > > already merged in. > > Thibaut, the

Re: Bug#350501: nscd: [hppa] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x42

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:21:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > This bug is already being ignored (manually) for testing. Please don't > munge bugs just to make britney happy. Great, thanks. So all we need now is an upload of ia64 binaries (which have been successfully built), right? Denis

binNMU for approx

Hi, approx still depends on ocaml-base-nox-3.09.0 on hppa, m68k, mips, mipsel, s390. Could you trigger a binNMU on these architectures for the transition to 3.09.1? Thanks, Julien Cristau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

udeb migration now that 2.6.15 is in testing

Now that 2.6.15 is in testing (Yay!) let's migrate the udebs that waited on that to happen. unblock user-setup/2.12r-6 unblock cdebconf/0.97 # 8 days old currently I'm not sure how the following package should be hinted as it used to have a deb, but now only has a udeb: network-console

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (I)

Hi Joey, would you entertain a one-line fix removing the deluser command from the postrm of chipcard-tools (source package libchipcard). I'm having trouble with this on #346527 (still need to figure out how to fix this for users upgrading from original sarge) and think that this could be simple en

Re: udeb migration now that 2.6.15 is in testing

Frans Pop wrote: > Now that 2.6.15 is in testing (Yay!) let's migrate the udebs that waited > on that to happen. > > unblock user-setup/2.12r-6 > unblock cdebconf/0.97 # 8 days old currently Hints added. > I'm not sure how the following package should be hinted as it used to have > a

Re: Bug#350501: nscd: [hppa] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x42

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:15:03PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:21:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This bug is already being ignored (manually) for testing. Please don't > > munge bugs just to make britney happy. > Great, thanks. So all we need now is an upload

You Will Love This 4IU3

Good News! Interested to obtain Bachelors', Masters', MBA's, Doctorate & Ph.D. degrees available in your field in 2 weeks time? It's available now... Call Us and get yours today 1-484-693-8861 Our Education office has someone available 24 hours a day, 7 Days a week Why waiting? 1-484-693-886

making udev require 2.6.15 kernels

Now that 2.6.15 kernels are in testing I'd like to raise the kernel requirement for the udev package from 2.6.12 to 2.6.15 as soon as a new version of udev will have entered testing. This will let me remove a lot of cruft from the package. Does anybody have a reason to wait some more time? -- cia

Re: making udev require 2.6.15 kernels

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > Now that 2.6.15 kernels are in testing I'd like to raise the kernel > requirement for the udev package from 2.6.12 to 2.6.15 as soon as a new > version of udev will have entered testing. > This will let me remove a lot of cruft from the package. > Does an

Re: making udev require 2.6.15 kernels

On Feb 10, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But udev will refuse to start or to install if the running kernel is > older then it? As it currently happens, it will either: - refuse to be upgraded - be installed but not started if it was not installed yet - not be started at boot time if

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (I)

Thomas Viehmann wrote: > would you entertain a one-line fix removing the deluser command from the > postrm of chipcard-tools (source package libchipcard). > I'm having trouble with this on #346527 (still need to figure out how to > fix this for users upgrading from original sarge) and think that th

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update (II)

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update == An up-to-date version is at . I am preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so

Re: making udev require 2.6.15 kernels

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:54:42AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 10, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But udev will refuse to start or to install if the running kernel is > > older then it? > As it currently happens, it will either: > - refuse to be upgraded > - be installed