Malo ni!
Ea mai koe?
***
IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THE NEWLY TRANSLATED DOT TK WEBSITE
PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE ALWAYS INCLUDE
IN YOUR COMMENT THE LANGUAGE YOU ARE COMMENTING ON AND THE
HTML OR SCRIPT PAGE
El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 18:00, David Nusinow escribió:
> Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to go in
> to testing. While I'm tempted to get -5 with your SELinux fix in first, I
> think un
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:06:59PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 18:00, David Nusinow escribió:
> > Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> > things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to go in
> > to te
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:57:01PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> We are currently blocking any graphical package from migrating to testing.
> If we don't get X.Org in to testing, it's going to be a mass migration of
> these things in at once, and I'd rather try to avoid that if possible.
Sorry, "m
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:06:59PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 18:00, David Nusinow escribió:
> > Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of
> > things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to go in
> > to te
El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 00:35, Steve Langasek escribió:
[...]
> xorg-x11 remains a blocker for GNOME and KDE as long as xorg-x11 is not in
> testing. It just ceases to be a blocker for being able to *build* KDE
> packages once it's in the archive on all architectures.
>
> As for the RC bug
6 matches
Mail list logo
