heavy dependency on debootstrap

2005-02-25 Thread Sébastien Chaumat
Hello, My package (replicator) depends heavily on the exact behavior of the deboostrap package : debootstrap is called with a list of additional packages to install and I always must sync this list with the actual dependencies in sarge. Thus I always need a delay (mainly because regression test

Re: heavy dependency on debootstrap

2005-02-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sébastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > My package (replicator) depends heavily on the exact behavior of the > deboostrap package : debootstrap is called with a list of additional > packages to install and I always must sync this list with the actual > dependencies in sarge.

Re: heavy dependency on debootstrap

2005-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:25:05AM +0100, Sébastien Chaumat wrote: > My package (replicator) depends heavily on the exact behavior of the > deboostrap package : debootstrap is called with a list of additional > packages to install and I always must sync this list with the actual > dependencies

Re: please remove luola-levels + loula from testing

2005-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:45:56PM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: > The current versions of luola-levels (5.1-1) and luola (1.2.5-1) in testing > are incompatible which caused RC-bug 292803. > I've talked to the maintainer and he agreed to ask for removal. (of course > preferring a build of sdl-mixer1.2

Re: please remove luola-levels + loula from testing

2005-02-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:22:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:45:56PM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: > > The current versions of luola-levels (5.1-1) and luola (1.2.5-1) in testing > > are incompatible which caused RC-bug 292803. > > > I've talked to the maintainer and he

Re: OpenLDAP issues

2005-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:59:35AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:34:44PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > If it wasn't clear from my previous messages on the subject, I was speaking > > as a release manager when I approached Snow-Man about this matter on IRC. :) > >

gjdoc (0.7.1-2) and javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) to Sarge

2005-02-25 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, gjdoc (0.7.1-2) is now able to build acceptable javadoc for java libs and java apps. Thanks to let it go to Sarge. With this gjdoc, I've been able to generate the javadoc for package javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) so RC Bug #279374 is now closed

Re: OpenLDAP issues

2005-02-25 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Steve, > > Currently: > > > - package overldap between libldap2 and libldap2.2 (remove files from > > libldap2.2 I'd say) Fixed. > > - config file syntax change: old "attribute=foo" is now "attrlist=foo" Fixed for new installations, upgrades will break. > > If you find more problems I'd l

Re: heavy dependency on debootstrap

2005-02-25 Thread Sébastien Chaumat
Steve Langasek a écrit : It's very unlikely that we would delay the release over design flaws in a single priority: optional package such as this one. The inability of debootstrap to resolve package dependencies on its own is a design flaw that we have to live with for sarge because the cost of ch

Re: debian-release FAQ wikipage?

2005-02-25 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:44:21PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:15:09PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > I've started a [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ at > > http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianReleaseFAQ > > > I hope it can help save some valuable release team time and reduce >

please rebuild xfree86 on sparc and m68k

2005-02-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
The fixed xfree86 has been uploaded, but it requires the chroot to be cleaned and the build to be requeued. Builds have now succeeded for all archs except sparc and m68k. Many things are depending on this happening, blocking packages which need to get into shape for sarge. Would you please make

Your account #49V7051

2005-02-25 Thread High rates!
Hello, We tried contacting you a while ago about your low interest mort age rate. You have qualified for the lowest rate in years. You could get over $380,000 for as little as $500 a month! Ba(d credit? Doesn't matter, low rates are fixed no matter what! To get a free, no obli,gation consultation