Excess copies of libdb

2004-03-29 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Steve Langasek wrote: >> db3 >> #223142, #234507 >> db4.0 >> #223140 >> I know we can't remove them. One of the base problems > > It would be nice to see fewer copies of libdb in sarge, in all honesty. > Christian Perrier reported on debian-boot that there are no less than > six versions currentl

Re: Excess copies of libdb

2004-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 12:53:14AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >> db3 > >> #223142, #234507 > >> db4.0 > >> #223140 > >> I know we can't remove them. One of the base problems > > It would be nice to see fewer copies of libdb in sarge, in all honesty. > > Christian Perrier reported on debian-

Onderwerp: Norman Internet Protection - Malware-waarschuwing!

2004-03-29 Thread bkuiper
Verzender: Geadresseerde: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Onderwerp: Re: Thank you for delivery Gevonden malware: Bestand komt overeen met naam in blokkeerlijst; is geblokkeerd. Bestandsnaam van bijlage: data.rtf .scr Status: geblokke

Onderwerp: Norman Internet Protection - Malware-waarschuwing!

2004-03-29 Thread bkuiper
Verzender: Geadresseerde: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Onderwerp: Re: Thank you for delivery Gevonden malware: Bestand komt overeen met naam in blokkeerlijst; is geblokkeerd. Bestandsnaam van bijlage: data.rtf .scr Status: geblokke

Removing zope

2004-03-29 Thread Nathanael Nerode
For zope to be removed, one must also do this: remove zope-textindexng2/2.05-1 remove zope-zpatterns/0.4.3p2-17 -- Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/

NMU sysklogd and/or switch to different system logger?

2004-03-29 Thread Nathanael Nerode
sysklogd has two annoyingly-long-open patched RC bugs. (syslog-ng, for example, doesn't.) sysklogd's maintainer (Martin Schulze) is presumably too busy to deal with it, or something. Either sysklogd should be NMUed, or a different syslog package should be the default for sarge. Thoughts? -- Ma

exim 4.31 (was: Release update)

2004-03-29 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:40:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: [...] > * As of now, no new packages will be added to the base system. This > means that packages in the base system *must not* change their > package relationships. > > * Large changes to the base system must be cleared wi

(205)Guaranteed to boost size(85)

2004-03-29 Thread Percy Wall
gzqqrcdngsvnkd janttdrhswu ceasiqcfgdasfm onazhobpqn aqhfdccwzrw kyqjencrsumc The only solution to Penis Enlargement qdnryudkjo mslilskrykxs LIMITED OFFER: Add at least 3 INCHES or get your money back! eicwisncgsxh etjrgkdqxouit We are so sure our product works we are willing to prove it by

Re: Release update

2004-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 06:21:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > (copy to Alastair McKinstry as slang packages maintainer, Shlomi > Loubaton as current worker on BIDI support for d-i and -boot as this > concern comes from Debian Installer needs) > > * As of now, no new packages will be added

Re: Release update

2004-03-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > As mentioned on IRC, I believe it would be inappropriate to add > libfribidi0 to the base system at this stage, since this would be a > significant change to a very important library (libslang). Fortunately, > we can have d-i translated into Hebrew an

Re: XFree86 4.3.0 and testing (was: when will the release release)

2004-03-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 06:39:47AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > >... > > > > Kamion said the only t

Re: Excess copies of libdb

2004-03-29 Thread Clint Adams
> Hopefully this should be easy to switch to either libdb3 or libdb4.2. The People should be encouraged to move things away from db3, not to it. Debian's db3 is 3.2.9, which is arguably buggier than 3.3.11, which was the final release of db3, back in 2001. I think it's about time to get current.

Re: Excess copies of libdb

2004-03-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > --> libdb3: > rpm (and librpm4) > libsasl2 > dhelp > libpam-modules > openoffice.org-bin OOo builds and (apparently) works with db3, db4.0, 4.1 and (I tested this yesterday) 4.2, too - the db stuff is afais just used for

Re: Excess copies of libdb

2004-03-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Clint Adams wrote: > > Hopefully this should be easy to switch to either libdb3 or libdb4.2. The > > People should be encouraged to move things away from db3, not to it. > Debian's db3 is 3.2.9, which is arguably buggier than 3.3.11, which was > the f

Re: Excess copies of libdb

2004-03-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 12:53:14AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > OK, just as a data point, here are the things on my system built against > various versions of libdb other than libdb4.2. > --> libdb1-compat > libc6 > > Is there ever going to be any way to get rid of this waste of space? > :-(

Re: Excess copies of libdb

2004-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:43:45AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > $ grep-available -FDepends -sPackage libdb4.1 | wc -l > 65 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep-available -FDepends -sPackage libdb4.1 > Package: libapache-mod-auth-mysql > Package: vacation > Package: libapache-mod-security > Package: libap