On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:56:28PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1308 +0200]:
> > I don't think this is RC; you're welcome to sort out what you
> > believe to be the correct solution, and upload -- and if there's
> > time, we can consider
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1308 +0200]:
> I don't think this is RC; you're welcome to sort out what you
> believe to be the correct solution, and upload -- and if there's
> time, we can consider it.
I will rather spend my time on other RC things then.
Can we includ
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:18:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1110 +0200]:
> > Does the package fail to install in this case? That's perfectly reasonable
> > behavior if the user is ignoring critical questions from debconf. The
> > s
* Steve Langasek
> Does the package fail to install in this case? That's perfectly
> reasonable behavior if the user is ignoring critical questions from
> debconf. The solution for such cases is for the user to either
> preseed the debconf cache, or not expect non-interactive installs to
> work.
also sprach Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1209 +0200]:
> With regard to this particular bug, I think the default should be not
> to create an instance like Martin suggested yesterday. Why a package
> like Zope /insists/ on creating an instance for you is beyond me..
Zope 2.6 i
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1110 +0200]:
> Does the package fail to install in this case? That's perfectly reasonable
> behavior if the user is ignoring critical questions from debconf. The
> solution for such cases is for the user to either preseed the debconf cach
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 06:43:43PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.25.1814 +0200]:
> > Even with this patch applied, I would think the bug would still appear
> > with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, no?
> Yes, and then we have a problem bec
* martin f krafft
> In the meantime, the following patch to debian/zope.config or
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/zope.config should fix the problem:
>
> 55c55
> < db_input medium $PKG/admin-user || true
> ---
> > db_input critical $PKG/admin-user || true
> 66c66
> < db_i
also sprach Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.25.1814 +0200]:
> Even with this patch applied, I would think the bug would still appear
> with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, no?
Yes, and then we have a problem because there simply is no default
for a password, is there? And I refuse to
tags 310644 + confirmed patch
thanks
also sprach Noah Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.25.1606 +0200]:
> Basically, zope will not install, either from scratch or via upgrade
> from woody, if debconf is configured to hide questions of medium
> priority. This probably does not warrant a packa
Hello. Yesterday I submitted bug 310644 against zope. This was
discovered when doing some test upgrades of woody systems.
Basically, zope will not install, either from scratch or via upgrade
from woody, if debconf is configured to hide questions of medium
priority. This probably does not warran
11 matches
Mail list logo
