Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:42:28PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I have problems with those: > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/pcmcia/memory_cs.o > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/pcmcia/ftl_cs.o > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/mo

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, they're being uploaded right now. I have problems with those: depmod: *** Unresolved sym

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, they're being uploaded right now. Ok, I'm building 2.2.20 i386 (binary only) with this ri

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > pcmcia-cs OK, they're being uploaded right now. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:14:08PM +1100, herbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then. >

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:14:24PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Yesterday evening (US MST) I tried building the modules a few more times > and had joeyh test them, but they always had symbol issues I don't > have gcc272 installed on my boxes, so I don't understand why the symbols > don't m

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-28 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In reference to a message from Herbert Xu, dated Nov 28: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > > pcmcia-cs > > > > OK, I'll do that on

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-28 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Herbert Xu, dated Nov 28: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then. >

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > pcmcia-cs OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then. The compiler change is due to the kgcc/gcc272 detection in 2.2.18pre.

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-27 Thread Randolph Chung
> If it is possible for someone to build a new > pcmcia-modules-2.2.218pre21 I can possibly build boot-floppies 2.2.19 > with that tonight. If not, we're going to have broken pcmcia on > i386/vanilla kernel, which may or may not be a release blocker in the > release manager's eyes. > > Of course,

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-23 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 01:29:46AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If it is possible for someone to build a new > > pcmcia-modules-2.2.218pre21 I can possibly build boot-floppies 2.2.19 > > with that tonight. If not, we're going to have broken pcmcia

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If it is possible for someone to build a new > pcmcia-modules-2.2.218pre21 I can possibly build boot-floppies 2.2.19 > with that tonight. If not, we're going to have broken pcmcia on > i386/vanilla kernel, which may or may not be a release blocker in th

yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I just confirmed to my dismay that pcmcia for the vanilla (default) kernel for boot-floppies 2.2.18 on i386 is broken. That means we need to update pcmcia-modules-2.2.18pre21 for i386. The real snag is that I'm out tonight (flying home) and then flying off on vacation tomorrow morning. I will b