Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Holger Levsen wrote: > does that even work? AIUI this would require LTS uploaders > to have access to security.d.o, which won't happen because > of embargoed issues… Access to security.d.o is only needed if you have to approve the uploads. Here the suite will be reconfigure

Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=prep-wheezy-lts;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org > > > > While these two are long-standing enhancement bugs which would make > > the security team work much easier, they are unrelated

Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 22. Februar 2016, Guido Günther wrote: > > As I understand it, the plan is for wheezy-lts to re- use > > security.d.o:wheezy/updates directly, rather than a separate suite on > > ftp-master. Is that correct? > > I think so. See > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.

Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-22 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Mortiz, On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:28:48PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:42:20PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > [apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the >

Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-22 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:42:20PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi Adam, > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > [apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the > > original got eaten due to a misconfiguration on my side - please only > > reply to

Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 18:42 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi Adam, > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > If so then we need to consider how the transition works in the short > > term. For example, the final point release of oldstable occurs after > > security

Re: wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-22 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Adam, On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the > original got eaten due to a misconfiguration on my side - please only > reply to this copy] > > Hi, > > As I understand it, the plan is for wheezy-lts t

wheezy-security to wheezy-lts transition

2016-02-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the original got eaten due to a misconfiguration on my side - please only reply to this copy] Hi, As I understand it, the plan is for wheezy-lts to re-use security.d.o:wheezy/updates directly, rather than a separate suite on ftp-maste