* Otavio Salvador [Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:29:44 -0300]:
> Why not marking it for removal from lenny and later let it go in
> wouldn't make it?
Nope, all architectures *present in unstable* must be in sync.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 15:28:45 +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the arch list for usplash-theme-debian changed between versions 4 and 3.
>> Now the package is no longer migrated to testing because of the "missing"
>> arch package. Can the
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 15:28:45 +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the arch list for usplash-theme-debian changed between versions 4 and 3.
> Now the package is no longer migrated to testing because of the "missing"
> arch package. Can the RM's fix this by removing the extra arch packages
>
Hi,
the arch list for usplash-theme-debian changed between versions 4 and 3.
Now the package is no longer migrated to testing because of the "missing"
arch package. Can the RM's fix this by removing the extra arch packages
from testing?
--
David Härdeman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
4 matches
Mail list logo