Raphael Geissert wrote:
> It appears that libpng upstream is going to abandon libpng12 by the end of
> the year [1]. Luckily, RedHat and others still need to support it for many
> years, meaning we wouldn't be alone when fixing security issues and the
> like.
After a discussion between upstream an
Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010 à 20:29 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:13 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Switching to libpng 1.4.x for squeeze would require a transition.
>
> You missed the words "rather large" out of the above sentence.
>
> Assuming that I can count,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 08:29:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:13 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Switching to libpng 1.4.x for squeeze would require a transition.
>
> You missed the words "rather large" out of the above sentence.
>
> Assuming that I can count, the
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:13 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Switching to libpng 1.4.x for squeeze would require a transition.
You missed the words "rather large" out of the above sentence.
Assuming that I can count, there are 580 source packages in the archive
building a binary package which dep
Hi,
It appears that libpng upstream is going to abandon libpng12 by the end of the
year [1]. Luckily, RedHat and others still need to support it for many years,
meaning we wouldn't be alone when fixing security issues and the like.
Anibal, what are your plans? do you know what upstream's plans
5 matches
Mail list logo
