Hello Andi,
On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Freeze does really mean: No new changes unless really required.
you meman, I should consider opening an RC bug against the package?
You also didn't answer the questions about the other packages.
Best
Hello Andi,
On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but that are way too many changes after freeze.
well, the 1.2.1-4 package version is much more broken, and it did take
so much time to clean up for a reason (and some RL factors I could not
influ
* Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:22]:
> and some non-reported packaging errors like overwriting config files,
> wrongly being packaged as a Debian native package when it should have
> been a "normal" package, garbled source,* and, as a feature, (hopefully)
> fixed runit support - the o
Hello,
On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
> unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
> same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix
4 matches
Mail list logo