Re: updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Andi, On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Freeze does really mean: No new changes unless really required. you meman, I should consider opening an RC bug against the package? You also didn't answer the questions about the other packages. Best

Re: updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Andi, On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, but that are way too many changes after freeze. well, the 1.2.1-4 package version is much more broken, and it did take so much time to clean up for a reason (and some RL factors I could not influ

Re: updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:22]: > and some non-reported packaging errors like overwriting config files, > wrongly being packaged as a Debian native package when it should have > been a "normal" package, garbled source,* and, as a feature, (hopefully) > fixed runit support - the o

updated package: roundup 1.2.1-5 (was: Etch frozen!)

2006-12-11 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in > unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the > same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix