Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Wichert, are you doing the compiles for sparc/slink to get sparc
> up-to-date with 2.1r5?
Christian Meder (hope I remembered the name correctly..) was afaik..
Wichert.
--
_
/ Generally uninteresti
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 06:59:32PM +, Dave Love wrote:
> > "CM" == Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > > [Vincent 2000/01/07]
> >> > > package : emacs20
> >> > > version : 20.5a-1.99
> >> > > architectures: i386 m68k sparc (ALPHA MISSING)
> >> >
> "CM" == Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > [Vincent 2000/01/07]
>> > > package : emacs20
>> > > version : 20.5a-1.99
>> > > architectures: i386 m68k sparc (ALPHA MISSING)
>> > > issue: Y2K fix in lisp/timezone.el
>> >
>> > That's a hard
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 05:49:32PM +, Vincent Renardias wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Christian Meder wrote:
>
> > See below on alpha and sparc issues.
> >
> > > [Vincent 2000/01/07]
> > > package : emacs19
> > > version : 19.34-21.1
> > > architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Roman Hodek wrote:
>
> >
> > > Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis?
> >
> > Here the m68k answer:
>
> Just to be 100% sure: the m68k boot floppies are okay now?
There are files in proposed-updates that in
> > Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis?
Correction:
mutt_1.0.0-3.2 for m68k is in proposed-updates, but we need
mutt_1.0.1.0-3.2 instead. Seems I couldn't distinguish those version
numbers :-)
The newer version is currently compiling.
Roman
> Just to be 100% sure: the m68k boot floppies are okay now?
Don't know, I don't do them.
Roman
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Roman Hodek wrote:
>
> > Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis?
>
> Here the m68k answer:
Just to be 100% sure: the m68k boot floppies are okay now?
Regards,
Anne Bezemer
> Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis?
Here the m68k answer:
The following packages (you marked as M68K missing) are already in
proposed-updates:
tetex-bin_0.9.981113-4
nethack_3.2.3-3
mutt_1.0.0-3.2
groff_1.15.1.11a.7.Y2K-1
mush_7.2.5unoff2-7.0.1
adjtimex_
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Ok, we'll see tomorrow if it has been accepted.
Why wait when you can easily check that yourself?
~maor/dinstall/dinstall -n xxx.changes
will tell you what dinstall will do with your upload.
Wichert.
--
___
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Christian Meder wrote:
> See below on alpha and sparc issues.
>
> > [Vincent 2000/01/07]
> > package : emacs19
> > version : 19.34-21.1
> > architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68K MISSING)
> > issue: Y2K fix in lisp/timezone.el
>
> The packag
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 04:48:22PM +, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis?
See below on alpha and sparc issues.
> [Vincent 2000/01/07]
> package : emacs19
> version : 19.34-21.1
> architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68K M
Thanks to Christian's compile effort on alpha and sparc, the list of
missing packages to recompile has reduced a lot:
# grep SPARC 2.1r5.txt.1 | wc -l
6
# grep M68K 2.1r5.txt.1 | wc -l
11
# grep ALPHA 2.1r5.txt.1 | wc -l
5
Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5
13 matches
Mail list logo
