Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:28:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It seems to me that if a package is in NEW in order to fix a bug in > > > testing (especially an important or higher severity bug), then we > > > shouldn't freeze until the bug f

Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-22 Thread Andreas Barth
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050322 04:15]: > (Why not wait the freeze until NEW processing has caught up?) If the new processing continues with the current speed, it will catch up before the freeze in either case. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024

Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It seems to me that if a package is in NEW in order to fix a bug in > > testing (especially an important or higher severity bug), then we > > shouldn't freeze until the bug fix has propogated throught NEW > > processing. > > Generally, yes. I don't

Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:18:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Because NEW processing is a treadmill, and not a release issue except in > > select cases. > Right, let me be more precise about what I'm suggesting. > It seems to me that if a p

Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Because NEW processing is a treadmill, and not a release issue except in > select cases. Right, let me be more precise about what I'm suggesting. It seems to me that if a package is in NEW in order to fix a bug in testing (especially an important or h

Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:11:55PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, speaking as a gnucash user, I'd appreciate it if the spurious > > dependencies were dropped ASAP, rather than waiting on a new library version > > that might not make it out

Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, speaking as a gnucash user, I'd appreciate it if the spurious > dependencies were dropped ASAP, rather than waiting on a new library version > that might not make it out of the NEW queue before we freeze. Ok, I'll do what I can. (Why not wait

Re: two gnucash bits

2005-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Thomas, On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:29:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Thanks for pushing gnucash into testing before the arm build > finished. It's now been installed (along with grisbi and libofx, the > packages tied to it) and the arm version should migrate too. I don't > know whethe

two gnucash bits

2005-03-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Thanks for pushing gnucash into testing before the arm build finished. It's now been installed (along with grisbi and libofx, the packages tied to it) and the arm version should migrate too. I don't know whether this happens automatically or not. I would like to fix the bad advice I took on the