Re: ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-12-27 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:26:27 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > I would much prefer if a new upload is made, so it is properly shown > with a maintainer that cares - and not one that wants it gone. A simple > rebuild for it shouldnt be much of a problem, its arch:all, not likely > to break much. I've

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Keith Packard wrote: > Right, so I'd love to see Deja Vu contain only the Latin set which can > be derived from the existing high-quality, well hinted, glyphs in the > original Vera design, augmented by taking those glyphs and creating the > alternate forms which V

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-28 Thread Keith Packard
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 15:23 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Shouldn't that be a bug reported against DejaVu fonts, then ? Sure, but I doubt it will be fixed. Hinting glyphs is the hard part of font design, and I don't know of any tools available to people outside the world of commercial font de

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-28 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Keith Packard (kei...@keithp.com): > One of the big efforts with Bitstream was in adjusting the instructed > hints within the font to take advantage of our text rendering > environment; considerable effort was applied in tuning those for > FreeType and Xft. Cairo adopts the same text rende

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-26 Thread Keith Packard
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 07:57 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > (reducing CC list to the acceptable minimum) > > Quoting Keith Packard (kei...@keithp.com): > > > The main 'improvement' that should be made in dejavu is to remove glyphs > > which are not part of the core latin set; mixing multiple ch

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-26 Thread Christian Perrier
(reducing CC list to the acceptable minimum) Quoting Keith Packard (kei...@keithp.com): > The main 'improvement' that should be made in dejavu is to remove glyphs > which are not part of the core latin set; mixing multiple character sets > into a single font precludes people from choosing a more

Re: ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-25 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Given Keith’s reaction, he’ll probably volunteer to maintain it if > > Daniel doesn’t want to do it anymore. I’m also CCing pkg-fonts in case > > people want to jump on the occasion to team-maintain it instead. >

Re: ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Given Keith’s reaction, he’ll probably volunteer to maintain it if > Daniel doesn’t want to do it anymore. I’m also CCing pkg-fonts in case > people want to jump on the occasion to team-maintain it instead. i don't want to sound ignorrant, but for me, there's really no po

Re: ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11791 March 1977, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Is it possible to put back ttf-bitstream-vera in unstable, using the > version in testing (which was the last uploaded one anyway)? Otherwise, > I guess we just have to wait for a new upload. Well, technically yes it is possible. I would much prefer

ttf-bitstream-vera should not have been removed

2009-06-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, I have noticed unexpectedly that ttf-bitstream-vera was removed from unstable some time ago, as requested by Daniel Baumann. However, ttf-dejavu might be more complete, but there are some reasons why the original Vera fonts are better for occidental languages; which is why they are still selec