Re: transitional package question

2010-10-31 Thread Harald Jenny
Hi and sorry for being noisy On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:55:04AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, and thanks for reminding me] > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:14 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:33:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >

Re: transitional package question

2010-10-14 Thread Harald Jenny
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:55:04AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, and thanks for reminding me] Thanks for answering me as I guess you are pretty busy with other issues. > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:14 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010

Re: transitional package question

2010-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, and thanks for reminding me] On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:14 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:33:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [ Adding an amavisd-new-milter transitional package to amavisd-milter ] > > Are the interfaces / configu

Re: transitional package question

2010-09-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 03:02 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote: > I'm new to Debian package maintainership so please forgive me if this question > is dumb: A package I maintain (amavisd-milter) is recommend by amavisd-new > upstream as a replacement for their amavisd-new-milter program which got > removed.

transitional package question

2010-09-08 Thread Harald Jenny
Dear release team, I'm new to Debian package maintainership so please forgive me if this question is dumb: A package I maintain (amavisd-milter) is recommend by amavisd-new upstream as a replacement for their amavisd-new-milter program which got removed. Talking with Debian amavisd-new maintainer