Re: tracking removals from testing

2004-03-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:53:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Moving this from IRC to the list: > Would it be worth considering a "testing" pseudopackage > that people could file removal requests against? > no problem as far as I'm concerned, although I occasionally >

Re: tracking removals from testing

2004-03-20 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 09:33:57AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:53:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > Maybe we should use the "confirmed" tag on RC bugs as a cue that the > > > package definitely needs removing? (Or perhaps a "sarge-c

Re: tracking removals from testing

2004-03-19 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:53:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Maybe we should use the "confirmed" tag on RC bugs as a cue that the > > package definitely needs removing? (Or perhaps a "sarge-confirmed" tag > > until version-tracking is finished) [snip] > Every pa

Re: tracking removals from testing

2004-03-18 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:53:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Maybe we should use the "confirmed" tag on RC bugs as a cue that the > package definitely needs removing? (Or perhaps a "sarge-confirmed" tag > until version-tracking is finished) Eh, I use the 'confirmed' tag for bugs (RC or not) th

tracking removals from testing

2004-03-18 Thread Anthony Towns
Yoho, Moving this from IRC to the list: Would it be worth considering a "testing" pseudopackage that people could file removal requests against? no problem as far as I'm concerned, although I occasionally browse the ftp.debian.org pseudopackage. People sometimes file