Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
>>> ...<
>> If you're going to maintain or co-maintain this package I'll be glad
>> to sponsor it for you, though.
> Great! No sponsoring would be necessary though -- I am a freshly
> cooked DD ;-) I didn't have much experienc
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
> >...<
> If you're going to maintain or co-maintain this package I'll be glad
> to sponsor it for you, though.
Great! No sponsoring would be necessary though -- I am a freshly
cooked DD ;-) I didn't have much experience in co-maintaining packages
(besi
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 04:53:53PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Luk Claes wrote:
> > >...<
> > I'm afraid I don't see why we should unblock a package were noone took care
> > of
> > the RC bug in a for release point of view new package...
> Valid reasoning - abandoned p
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Luk Claes wrote:
> >...<
> I'm afraid I don't see why we should unblock a package were noone took care of
> the RC bug in a for release point of view new package...
Valid reasoning - abandoned package is not a good one for a stable
distribution! The reason is probably that Flo
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> severity 389691 normal
> thanks
>
> I am not sure why the maintainer didn't lower the severity -- this
> issues seems to be not even a keyjnote fault but SDL/ALSA configuration
> issue on the box of the submitter. So MOST of the people do not
> experience this bug, thus
severity 389691 normal
thanks
I am not sure why the maintainer didn't lower the severity -- this
issues seems to be not even a keyjnote fault but SDL/ALSA configuration
issue on the box of the submitter. So MOST of the people do not
experience this bug, thus at most it must be of normal severity.
6 matches
Mail list logo