Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 28 Sausis 2010 21:37:15 Riku Voipio wrote:
> Brilliant! This shall be the plan then:
>
> 1) identify affected libraries (Jakubs list as base?)
> 2) provide patches for the libraries and submit them to BTS
> 3) give maintainers X days to MU the libraries, after that procee
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 28 Sausis 2010 10:23:20 Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Interesting. Do you have a example on howto do that?
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/qt4-x11.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/92_arm
> el_gcc43_valist_compat.diff;h=1db
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Interesting. Do you have a example on howto do that?
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/qt4-x11.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/92_armel_gcc43_valist_compat.diff;h=1db7aa33b73193a8ac0ff563f7a81bff40bfab61;hb=b3e8073df9201386aa420d5f4cab839615a0c6c5
On 27.01.2010 23:11, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:19:35PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
On trečiadienis 27 Sausis 2010 22:47:55 Riku Voipio wrote:
There is a major problem with gcc 4.4 and armel - the ABI of va_list
changed (for c++ libraries). We need to decide one of
4 matches
Mail list logo