Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

* Philipp Kern [2011-03-03 22:47:24 CET]: > am Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:26:39PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > * Philipp Kern [2011-03-03 21:35 +0100]: > > > > #612789 - command line corruption > > > > > > > Please excuse my ignorance,

Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

Hi, am Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:26:39PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > * Philipp Kern [2011-03-03 21:35 +0100]: > > > #612789 - command line corruption > > > > > Please excuse my ignorance, but how is _strmove different than strcpy? > > D

Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

Hi, * Philipp Kern [2011-03-03 21:35 +0100]: > > > #612789 - command line corruption > > > > Please excuse my ignorance, but how is _strmove different than strcpy? > Do the strings in question overlap and you thus need to do it yourself > so t

Re: suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

Hi, sorry for the late response. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:20:51AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > The mcabber upstream contacted me and told me about a few things they > would like to see fixed within squeeze because they consider them rather > nasty or at least highly inconvenient for the user

suggested mcabber updates for 6.0.1

Hi! The mcabber upstream contacted me and told me about a few things they would like to see fixed within squeeze because they consider them rather nasty or at least highly inconvenient for the users. I suggested them to file bugreports about the issues together with the patches, which the