On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:23:07PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> (regarding python2.1-libplot and python2.2-libplot)
> >Both are apparently packages for obsolete versions of python, with no
> >reverse dependencies. Why don't we push for their removal instead?
> Quite right. I hadn't checked r
(regarding python2.1-libplot and python2.2-libplot)
>Both are apparently packages for obsolete versions of python, with no
>reverse dependencies. Why don't we push for their removal instead?
Quite right. I hadn't checked reverse dependencies this time. What's
the best way to do this; ask the m
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:57:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> python2.1-libplot
> python2.2-libplot
> Both need rebuilds for new C++-transitioned plotutils, but
> (a) apparently don't need any source or build-depends changes
> (b) don't produce C++ libraries so don't need the 'full treatment
python2.1-libplot
python2.2-libplot
Both need rebuilds for new C++-transitioned plotutils, but
(a) apparently don't need any source or build-depends changes
(b) don't produce C++ libraries so don't need the 'full treatment'.
The same has apparently been done already with libplot-perl, although
so
4 matches
Mail list logo
