Re: status of ghc / haskell transition

2023-10-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Adrian Hi Sebastian, > On 2023-10-20 08:30:21 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2023-10-19 18:00:29 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > > > > Do you need help from us? > > > > > > Can you please schedule the necessary bi

Re: status of ghc / haskell transition

2023-10-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Adrian On 2023-10-20 08:30:21 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-10-19 18:00:29 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > > > Do you need help from us? > > > > Can you please schedule the necessary binNMUs for the new GHC? We have a > > list here [3] that is updated every 4 hours. We are curren

Re: status of ghc / haskell transition

2023-10-19 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-10-19 18:00:29 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > > Do you need help from us? > > Can you please schedule the necessary binNMUs for the new GHC? We have a > list here [3] that is updated every 4 hours. We are currently blocked > until this happens, as we need all existing packages to build w

Re: status of ghc / haskell transition

2023-10-19 Thread Ilias Tsitsimpis
Hi Paul, On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 09:18PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > From a bystander view as a Release Manager, the situation looks a bit > stalled. So I'd like to know if there is any progress and/or if there are > plans to unlock the current situation. Unfortunately, Haskell transitions are too much

status of ghc / haskell transition

2023-10-18 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear Haskell maintainers, Since August 26, ghc has a version in unstable that triggered a haskell transition [1] and that hasn't been able to migrate to testing [2]. From a bystander view as a Release Manager, the situation looks a bit stalled. So I'd like to know if there is any progress and