Hi!
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 12:35:19 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:29:39AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Much of our infrastructure code comes from unpackaged projects (?),
> > which makes this an awkward requirement, I guess it's the price of
> > reusing existing package
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:29:39AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:28:27 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Quoting Johannes Schauer (2014-04-26 07:15:03)
> > > Because of this syntax change, packages that use this syntax can only be
> > > uploaded once tools in Debian stable
On 2014-05-01 05:29, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Just out of curiosity what part of the infrastructure requires an
> updated dpkg to get profiles support? My guess would be lintian and
> sbuild, anything else? Although isn't lintian run from a git checkout,
> or is that only for lintian.d.o and not for
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:28:27 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Johannes Schauer (2014-04-26 07:15:03)
> > Because of this syntax change, packages that use this syntax can only be
> > uploaded once tools in Debian stable support it because the build
> > infrastructure runs Debian stabl
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:28 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> adding Adam because of request from Helmut (also added).
fwiw, if you're looking for a Release Team opinion on something that's
already public, CCing me personally often isn't the best way of getting
one.
Aside from the fact that you ma
5 matches
Mail list logo
