Re: stable boot-floppies maint (was Re: M68K boot floppies / CDs)

2000-01-05 Thread Richard Braakman
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 10:36:16PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > On the recent reject - I got a message on Jan. 1 stating that my upload > from Dec. 13 or Dec. 14 (which was for r4) was _installed_ but a look at > the contents of the archive revealed that it had been installed only > partially. S

Re: stable boot-floppies maint (was Re: M68K boot floppies / CDs)

2000-01-05 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > The users, on the other hand, often need CD images and mostly use stable. > > At this time, though, there just are not enough maintainers to properly > > support stable. And getting updates to the boot-floppies rejected because > > they are not security related neither helps the users nor impro

stable boot-floppies maint (was Re: M68K boot floppies / CDs)

2000-01-05 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The users, on the other hand, often need CD images and mostly use stable. > At this time, though, there just are not enough maintainers to properly > support stable. And getting updates to the boot-floppies rejected because > they are not security rela