On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 18:03:50 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> I prepare a new upload.
>
sks/1.1.1+dpkgv3-6 unblocked, thanks.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I had some holiday, so I can only respond now.
Am 10.10.2010 11:40, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:14:25 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
>
>> Julien Cristau writes:
>>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 14:23:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>>>
Thanks for the answer. The upload
Hi Julien,
Am 09.10.2010 15:53, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 14:23:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the answer. The upload now succeded.
>>
> +DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += $(if $(BYTECODE)," nostrip",)
>
> Is that guaranteed to get exported to dh_strip's environment
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 21:08:05 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> Am 09.10.2010 15:53, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 14:23:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the answer. The upload now succeded.
> >>
> > +DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += $(if $(BYTECOD
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:14:25 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
> > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 14:23:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the answer. The upload now succeded.
> >>
> > +DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += $(if $(BYTECODE)," nostrip",)
> >
> > Is that guaran
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 14:23:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the answer. The upload now succeded.
>>
> +DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += $(if $(BYTECODE)," nostrip",)
>
> Is that guaranteed to get exported to dh_strip's environment?
It at least seems to work on th
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 14:23:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Thanks for the answer. The upload now succeded.
>
+DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += $(if $(BYTECODE)," nostrip",)
Is that guaranteed to get exported to dh_strip's environment?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am 09.10.2010 09:42, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 09:07:35 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>> There is again a bug (599029) which makes sks not runable on some
>> architectures using ocaml bytecode. On bytecode architectures the binary
>> should not be stripped. I uploaded
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 09:07:35 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> There is again a bug (599029) which makes sks not runable on some
> architectures using ocaml bytecode. On bytecode architectures the binary
> should not be stripped. I uploaded a fix to unstable, but I think it
> gets not processed
Hi,
Am 15.09.2010 15:01, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:54:38 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>> Due to a type in the rules file (see #596563) on the architectures where
>> the ocaml interpreter is needed the respective dependency was missing.
>> So I had to do a new upload
10 matches
Mail list logo