Hi,
On 11-10-2023 13:19, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
I think grub2 has migrated now either way, so the grub-efi-* ones can
migrate?
To be safe, I only added the hint for grub yesterday evening. I've
hinted grub-efi-* now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:21:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-10-2023 21:00, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > That's bug #983912 and I can't tell you what to do, but yes, generally
> > grub2 should go before grub-efi-*.
>
> During the migration run, would it just not accept grub-efi-
Hi,
On 10-10-2023 21:00, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
That's bug #983912 and I can't tell you what to do, but yes, generally
grub2 should go before grub-efi-*.
During the migration run, would it just not accept grub-efi-* in the
first run and would it accept it in the next run when grub2 has al
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:38:56PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-10-2023 18:59, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > It seems the binaries built but I guess someone needs to poke the
> > signing bits and once they are built they can all be released
>
> I was hoping to compare the package in
Hi,
On 10-10-2023 18:59, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
It seems the binaries built but I guess someone needs to poke the
signing bits and once they are built they can all be released
I was hoping to compare the package in tpu to the version in pu, but
apparently that version is still stuck in s
Hi release and ftp folks,
I uploaded grub2 2.06-13+deb13u1 (same as stable except changelog
header) to testing-proposed-updates as proposed by elbrus; since
we are still waiting for the XFS bug to be resolved.
It seems the binaries built but I guess someone needs to poke the
signing bits and once
6 matches
Mail list logo
