On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31:23 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I wonder whether I might be able to get some kind of response on my
> proposal to upload a tiff with libtiff5-alt-dev. To help you make a
> decision, I'm supplying the information you probably need. I'm hoping
> you'll be able to gi
I wonder whether I might be able to get some kind of response on my
proposal to upload a tiff with libtiff5-alt-dev. To help you make a
decision, I'm supplying the information you probably need. I'm hoping
you'll be able to give me a quick decision, or at least give me a quick
response indicating
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Jay Berkenbilt (19/05/2012):
>> Can you think of any reason that this could possibly cause any harm?
>> I don't think it will since it won't have any impact at all on
>> packages that don't explicitly build depend on libtiff5-alt-dev. I'm
>> going to go ahea
Hi Jay,
Jay Berkenbilt (19/05/2012):
> Can you think of any reason that this could possibly cause any harm?
> I don't think it will since it won't have any impact at all on
> packages that don't explicitly build depend on libtiff5-alt-dev. I'm
> going to go ahead and do the upload. If it's a ba
I'm planning on a new upload of tiff where all existing packages are
unchanged and there's a new package called libtiff5-alt-dev. This
package installed the tiff 4.x headers and libraries in a path that does
not conflict with libtiff4-dev, and it installs the libtiff pkg-config
files in the usual
5 matches
Mail list logo
