On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:25 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> > >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in
> >
> > unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems
> > arise. :)
>
> So, I made the QA
El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in
>
> unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems
> arise. :)
So, I made the QA upload few minutes ago.
luciano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer
> > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with
> > the proposed fix (which
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:16 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> > (CC is appreciated. I'm not following this list)
> >
> > Hey there,
> > I would like to upload a new xfs package to stable in order to fix a
> > the
> > sec
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:16 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> (CC is appreciated. I'm not following this list)
>
> Hey there,
> I would like to upload a new xfs package to stable in order to fix a the
> security issue 1447 [1], #521107 [2]. This was checked with the security team
> and is
(CC is appreciated. I'm not following this list)
Hey there,
I would like to upload a new xfs package to stable in order to fix a the
security issue 1447 [1], #521107 [2]. This was checked with the security team
and is a non-dsa case.
The debdiff: http://people.debian.org/~luciano/xfs/xfs.de
6 matches
Mail list logo
