Re: request to cancel unblock requests + request for removal of num-utils

2007-03-18 Thread Luk Claes
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:02:15PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: >> About the unblock request for num-utils 0.5-7 : Please consider removing >> num-utils from the etch release. Version 0.5-6 is not good enough in my >> opinion. > > Well, "not good enough for release" is an RC

Re: request to cancel unblock requests + request for removal of num-utils

2007-03-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:02:15PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > About the unblock request for num-utils 0.5-7 : Please consider removing > num-utils from the etch release. Version 0.5-6 is not good enough in my > opinion. Well, "not good enough for release" is an RC bug, so there's no reason not

Re: request to cancel unblock requests + request for removal of num-utils

2007-03-17 Thread Luk Claes
Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >> we're only unblocking RC >> bugfixes at this point, as stated in the last release team update mail. > > Oops, it seems that I had overlooked this update mail: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/03/m

request to cancel unblock requests + request for removal of num-utils

2007-03-16 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > we're only unblocking RC > bugfixes at this point, as stated in the last release team update mail. Oops, it seems that I had overlooked this update mail: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/03/msg00012.html Feel free to ign