Re: Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-19 Thread Neil McGovern
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org usertags 678979 wheezy-will-remove thanks On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Pete

Re: Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead > > > upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgr

Re: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead > > upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql > > 9.1. Therefore, we had to resolve to making an upgrade to

Re: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2012-10-07 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead > upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql > 9.1. Therefore, we had to resolve to making an upgrade to slony > version

request freeze exception for slony1-2

2012-09-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql 9.1. Therefore, we had to resolve to making an upgrade to slony version 2.1, and I request that that be allowed into wheezy now. To be precise: The source package name is