On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 10:13:47AM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
> > > 3. Tag the bug sarge-ignore:
> > 3. Have the bug tagged sarge-ignore:
> better would be:
> 3. Ask the release team to tag the bug sarge-ignore:
> Even if you beat the obvious over the head some still won't
> ge
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:33:37AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:29:08AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> > One of your sources packages, @SOURCEPACKAGE@, has been found to have one or
> > more release-critical bugs. Specifically, the version of the package that's
> > in
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:33:37AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:29:08AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> > One of your sources packages, @SOURCEPACKAGE@, has been found to have one or
> > more release-critical bugs. Specifically, the version of the package that's
> > in
> > 3. Tag the bug sarge-ignore:
> 3. Have the bug tagged sarge-ignore:
better would be:
3. Ask the release team to tag the bug sarge-ignore:
Even if you beat the obvious over the head some still won't
get it.
--Andre
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:29:08AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> One of your sources packages, @SOURCEPACKAGE@, has been found to have one or
> more release-critical bugs. Specifically, the version of the package that's in
> the Sarge repository has one or more release-critical bugs filed against
+++ David B Harris [03-11-25 03:02 -0500]:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 02:29:08 -0500
> David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Downgrade the bug:
>Only downgrade the bug to Important or lower if the bug isn't, in fact,
>release-critical. DO NOT downgrade a bug unless it's not
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:02:23 -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> Here's another version, with some niggles fixed and such. Manoj
> suggested a couple of changes as well, and they've been integrated.
Time for more suggestions then.
> In order to release this package with Sarge, action must be taken
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:46:23 +0100
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:29:08AM -0500, David B Harris écrivait:
> > No need to use it, but aj asked what sort of thing might be useful to
> > encourage people to fix RC bugs, and I think this would do it for me.
> >
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 02:29:08 -0500
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, here's a draft release-reminder email template, as discussed with
> aj on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> No need to use it, but aj asked what sort of thing might be useful to
> encourage people to fix RC bugs, and I think t
Le Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:29:08AM -0500, David B Harris écrivait:
> No need to use it, but aj asked what sort of thing might be useful to
> encourage people to fix RC bugs, and I think this would do it for me.
> One mail per source package per maintainer (I'd send it to the
> Maintainer: as well a
Hey, here's a draft release-reminder email template, as discussed with
aj on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No need to use it, but aj asked what sort of thing might be useful to
encourage people to fix RC bugs, and I think this would do it for me.
One mail per source package per maintainer (I'd send it to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
