> There isn't a lot of info in #342545. However, I suspect from the
> following comment
>
> > It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if
>
> > fldw -10(,sp),fr23
>
> that this is the same bug as reported here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20754
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
> > helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
> > #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
> >
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
> helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
> #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
> it).
Stev
Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
#341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
it).
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem from the bug log as though much progress is
b
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:16:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please
> let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.]
Yes, I do - thanks.
> Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, w
[cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please
let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.]
Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, which is affecting
builds of most Qt-related packages on hppa today? I had suggested to LaM
6 matches
Mail list logo
