Re: proposed gpm uploads to testing-proposed-updates

Hi, On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:41:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Feedback on the combined patch: > > debian/rules -- > > Setting -D_REENTRANT here is odd, you normally want this in the > upstream Makefiles (particularly since not everything built by this > package is a library). Not ne

Re: proposed gpm uploads to testing-proposed-updates

On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:36:51PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > There is an RC bug on sarge's gpm package, it has some other FTBFS > bugs. We have prepared two alternative uploads, one with the minimal > required changes and another one with low-risk stuff that would be > very nice to have in sarg

Re: proposed gpm uploads to testing-proposed-updates

Hi again, On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:36:51PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > The prefered patch is accumulative to the required one. > > Find them on: > > Peter reverted some change that was a bit risky to introduce in the "prefered" patch. I've adde

proposed gpm uploads to testing-proposed-updates

Hi, There is an RC bug on sarge's gpm package, it has some other FTBFS bugs. We have prepared two alternative uploads, one with the minimal required changes and another one with low-risk stuff that would be very nice to have in sarge and that's the one we would prefer. The prefered patch is accum