Re: potato section on security.debian.org

2000-05-16 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Why keep the new one? The 'updates' version has existed for ages and ages. Mostly because I used it myself on a couple of machines, I'll remove it before the release. Wichert. -- _ / Generally

Re: potato section on security.debian.org

2000-05-15 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > If you don't mind not making more pointless, needless changes, please use > > potato/updates not potato/security, then things will work fine when you > > add the stable symlink. > > Heh, okay. Renamed & a symlin

Re: potato section on security.debian.org

2000-05-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > If you don't mind not making more pointless, needless changes, please use > potato/updates not potato/security, then things will work fine when you > add the stable symlink. Heh, okay. Renamed & a symlink added so both will work now. Wichert. -- ___

Re: potato section on security.debian.org

2000-05-15 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Appropriate line for apt is: > >deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/security main contrib non-free If you don't mind not making more pointless, needless changes, please use potato/updates not potato/security, then things will work fine when

potato section on security.debian.org

2000-05-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Since no packages are being installed during the testing cycle I have started to add security fixes for potato to security.debian.org. I'm not going to recompile everything on there myself, so for now only i386 packages are present. Appropriate line for apt is: deb http://security.debian.org/