Re: please trigger binary recompile of libglu1-mesa

2006-10-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.08.1813 +0200]: > You've neglected to mention both the architecture and the version > of the broken package. I don't see anything of the sort in > unstable. Hm, lesson #253: do not run lintian on sarge on packages build for unstable. Sorry,

Re: please trigger binary recompile of libglu1-mesa

2006-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with > e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of > which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good. You've neglected to mention both the

Re: please trigger binary recompile of libglu1-mesa

2006-10-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with > e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of > which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good. > > I guess a si

please trigger binary recompile of libglu1-mesa

2006-10-08 Thread martin f krafft
libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good. I guess a simple recompile of the package would do the trick. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to