also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.08.1813 +0200]:
> You've neglected to mention both the architecture and the version
> of the broken package. I don't see anything of the sort in
> unstable.
Hm, lesson #253: do not run lintian on sarge on packages build for
unstable.
Sorry,
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with
> e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of
> which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good.
You've neglected to mention both the
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with
> e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of
> which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good.
>
> I guess a si
libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with
e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of
which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good.
I guess a simple recompile of the package would do the trick.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to
4 matches
Mail list logo