Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
Do you mean a 4.3.99.1-2? That would be fine for t-p-u if this is the only
change planned.
>> If someone prepares a patch against the *testing* version of the package
>> which enables the theme support, that would be accept
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> It has been 8 days, and only the arm build is missing; no build log was
> uploaded to buildd.debian.org for this version. Should this version be
> forced in testing?
Hmm, nevermind, it's missing for amd64 as well (I'm guessing from the
buildd.debian
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I've uploaded a simple change to 4.3.99.1-1 prepared by Yves-Alexis;
> please approve xfce4-session/4.3.99.1-2 in TPU.
It has been 8 days, and only the arm build is missing; no build log was
uploaded to buildd.debian.org for this version. Should this
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >Do you mean a 4.3.99.1-2? That would be fine for t-p-u if this is the only
> > >change planned.
> If someone prepares a patch against the *testing* version of the package
> which enables the theme support, that would be accepted in t-p-u.
I've upl
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:35:20PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On ven, 2006-12-15 at 11:36 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >> it
> >> will be -3, since -2 (sid) was built against the libpng in sid
> >-2 in sid is 4.3.99.2, new upstream
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:36:19AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >> Please consider a alternative solution (-3 against testing being
> >> uploaded to t-p-u?) including just the needed bits to use the default
> >> Debian Desktop Etch artwork. That will be a real bug considering that
> >> GNOME and
On 12/15/06, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 14:35 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Fixing my previous information it's supposed to be 4.3.99.1-2 in
> t-p-u, with the "desktop artwork related diff". Is it ok for you
> Yves-Alexis?
It's ok but I need to find a way
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 14:35 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Fixing my previous information it's supposed to be 4.3.99.1-2 in
> t-p-u, with the "desktop artwork related diff". Is it ok for you
> Yves-Alexis?
It's ok but I need to find a way to ship a default session file in
xfce4-session wich works
On 12/15/06, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 11:36 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> it
> will be -3, since -2 (sid) was built against the libpng in sid
-2 in sid is 4.3.99.2, new upstream release. Current Etch is 4.3.99.1-1.
Steve,
Fixing my previous informati
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 11:36 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> it
> will be -3, since -2 (sid) was built against the libpng in sid
-2 in sid is 4.3.99.2, new upstream release. Current Etch is 4.3.99.1-1.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On 12/15/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:43:32PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:27]:
> >> xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 01:15 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please consider a alternative solution (-3 against testing being
> > uploaded to t-p-u?) including just the needed bits to use the
> default
> > Debian Desktop Etch artwork. That will be a real bug considering
> that
> > GNOME and KDE wil
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:43:32PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:27]:
> >> xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which has been more or
> >> less uploaded to unstable,
On 12/12/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:27]:
> xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which has been more or
> less uploaded to unstable, with some delay (some rc2 packages have
> reached testing, some are only in unstable a
On mar, 2006-12-12 at 12:27 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I strongly recommend against re-uploading packages with so many
> changes
> to fix bugs we don't mind for etch.
By "reuploading" I guess you mean the -2 upload. I don't understand the
"so many changes". We just drop libhal-dev build-dep wh
* Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:27]:
> xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which has been more or
> less uploaded to unstable, with some delay (some rc2 packages have
> reached testing, some are only in unstable and few have not even been
> uploaded). xfce4-session 4.4
Hi,
xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which has been more or
less uploaded to unstable, with some delay (some rc2 packages have
reached testing, some are only in unstable and few have not even been
uploaded). xfce4-session 4.4rc2 is required for using common Debian
Artwork (splash scr
17 matches
Mail list logo
